XTR vs. HTUS
XTR (Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. XTR is passively managed, while HTUS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTR returned 17.61%/yr vs 21.99%/yr for HTUS. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XTR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
XTR vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTR achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly lower than HTUS's 15.06% return.
XTR
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 18.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.89%
HTUS
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- 6M
- 14.44%
- YTD
- 15.06%
- 1Y
- 25.97%
- 3Y*
- 21.99%
- 5Y*
- 15.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $550.77K | $518.69K | $626.15K | |
| $36.06K | $55.09K | $61.90K |
XTR vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF | 10.63% | 13.66% | 21.85% | 21.16% | -17.67% | 4.25% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 15.06% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTR and HTUS is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XTR and HTUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTR vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
XTR
HTUS
XTR vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XTR | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 3.00 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.75 | 14.28 | -5.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XTR vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTR drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTR | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -47.50% | +26.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -8.68% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -24.41% | +10.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -4.02% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.82% | +0.35% |
Volatility
XTR vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) is 3.76%, while Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that XTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTR | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 3.99% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 10.56% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.78% | 12.46% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 19.14% | -5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 21.53% | -7.73% |
XTR vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTR vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.08%, more than HTUS's 10.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.33% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF | 16.08% | 17.82% | 20.89% | 1.09% | 1.08% | 2.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, XTR and HTUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HTUS has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to XTR (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTR dropped -20.83% vs HTUS's -47.50%.
On 3-year performance, HTUS leads with 21.99% vs 17.61% for XTR. On fees, XTR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XTR has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 21.99% return vs 17.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for HTUS.
XTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.08%, compared with 10.33% for HTUS.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XTR and 0.96% for HTUS.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTR and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer