XTOC vs. FFTY
XTOC (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XTOC is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. XTOC is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTOC returned 14.71%/yr vs 21.57%/yr for FFTY. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XTOC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.
Performance
XTOC vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTOC achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 20.11% return.
XTOC
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 18.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFTY
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
XTOC vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October | 7.31% | 13.87% | 10.47% | 25.42% | -17.85% | 6.18% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 20.11% | 23.38% | 18.36% | 12.40% | -51.08% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTOC and FFTY is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XTOC and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
XTOC vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTOC
FFTY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
XTOC
FFTY
Financial Services
XTOC
FFTY
Communication Services
XTOC
FFTY
Consumer Cyclical
XTOC
FFTY
Healthcare
XTOC
FFTY
Industrials
XTOC
FFTY
Consumer Defensive
XTOC
FFTY
-
Energy
XTOC
FFTY
Utilities
XTOC
FFTY
Real Estate
XTOC
FFTY
-
Basic Materials
XTOC
FFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTOC vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
XTOC
FFTY
XTOC vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTOC | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 1.12 | +0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.86 | 1.55 | +1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.20 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 1.65 | +0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.28 | 4.36 | +8.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTOC | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.12 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.20 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
XTOC vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTOC drawdown since its inception was -24.09%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTOC and FFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTOC | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.09% | -59.46% | +35.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.41% | -23.29% | +15.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -29.60% | +11.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -15.34% | +15.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.87% | -22.38% | +17.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 8.77% | -7.39% |
Volatility
XTOC vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) is 1.11%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that XTOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTOC | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 9.42% | -8.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 26.18% | -18.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.19% | 34.09% | -24.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 29.14% | -13.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 27.41% | -12.25% |
XTOC vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTOC vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
XTOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 1.12% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
XTOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTOC and FFTY have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFTY has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to XTOC (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTOC dropped -24.09% vs FFTY's -59.46%.
On 3-year performance, FFTY leads with 21.57% vs 14.71% for XTOC. On fees, XTOC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTOC has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FFTY has performed better with a 21.57% return vs 14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTOC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for XTOC.
XTOC is categorized as Options Trading, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTOC and 0.80% for FFTY.
XTOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTOC and FFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer