XTOC vs. QTOC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XTOC (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October) and QTOC (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTOC returned 14.71%/yr vs 19.15%/yr for QTOC. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

XTOC vs. QTOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTOC achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly lower than QTOC's 10.79% return.

XTOC

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: 7.31%
• 6M: 8.16%
• 1Y: 18.28%
• 3Y*: 14.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTOC

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 3.29%
• YTD: 10.79%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 22.99%
• 3Y*: 19.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTOC vs. QTOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XTOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October	7.31%	13.87%	10.47%	25.42%	-17.85%	6.18%
QTOC Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October	10.79%	16.79%	14.90%	38.43%	-29.84%	6.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XTOC and QTOC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021	0.91

The correlation between XTOC and QTOC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XTOC vs. QTOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XTOC	QTOC
Technology	36.2%	54.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.9%	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	12.2%
Healthcare	8.4%	4.2%
Industrials	8.1%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	7.6%
Energy	3.5%	0.6%
Utilities	2.3%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.2%

Return for Risk

XTOC vs. QTOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTOC

XTOC Risk / Return Rank: 63
XTOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
XTOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
XTOC Omega Ratio Rank: 72
XTOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
XTOC Martin Ratio Rank: 72

QTOC

QTOC Risk / Return Rank: 58
QTOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QTOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QTOC Omega Ratio Rank: 65
QTOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
QTOC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTOC vs. QTOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XTOC	QTOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.85	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.66	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.39	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	2.40	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.28	11.68	+1.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XTOC vs. QTOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTOC Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the QTOC Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTOC and QTOC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTOC	QTOC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	1.85	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.50	+0.08

Drawdowns

XTOC vs. QTOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTOC drawdown since its inception was -24.09%, smaller than the maximum QTOC drawdown of -33.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTOC and QTOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTOC	QTOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.09%	-33.43%	+9.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.41%	-9.63%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.02%	-21.24%	+3.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.16%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.87%	-8.50%	+3.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.38%	1.97%	-0.59%

Volatility

XTOC vs. QTOC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) is 1.11%, while Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that XTOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTOC	QTOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.11%	1.26%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.51%	10.34%	-2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.19%	12.49%	-3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.16%	19.77%	-4.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.16%	19.77%	-4.61%

XTOC vs. QTOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XTOC and QTOC have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

XTOC vs. QTOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTOC nor QTOC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTOC and QTOC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, XTOC and QTOC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XTOC or QTOC?

QTOC has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to XTOC (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTOC dropped -24.09% vs QTOC's -33.43%.

Which ETF is better, XTOC or QTOC?

On 3-year performance, QTOC leads with 19.15% vs 14.71% for XTOC. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, XTOC has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTOC or QTOC?

Over the 3-year period, QTOC has performed better with a 19.15% return vs 14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTOC or QTOC?

XTOC and QTOC have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTOC or QTOC?

XTOC and QTOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XTOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.