PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTOC vs. QTOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTOC vs. QTOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTOC achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than QTOC's 9.53% return.


XTOC

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.31%
YTD
6.91%
6M
6.22%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
10Y*

QTOC

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
9.53%
6M
8.58%
1Y
18.87%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTOC vs. QTOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XTOC
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October
6.91%13.87%10.47%25.42%-17.85%6.65%
QTOC
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October
9.53%16.79%14.90%38.43%-29.84%7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XTOC and QTOC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.91

The correlation between XTOC and QTOC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTOC vs. QTOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTOC
XTOC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XTOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTOC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XTOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTOC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

QTOC
QTOC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QTOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOC Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTOC vs. QTOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTOCQTOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.31

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.97

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.14

9.51

+1.63

XTOC vs. QTOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTOC Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the QTOC Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTOC and QTOC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTOC vs. QTOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTOC drawdown since its inception was -24.09%, smaller than the maximum QTOC drawdown of -33.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTOC and QTOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTOCQTOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.09%

-33.43%

+9.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-9.63%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-21.24%

+3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-1.43%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-8.40%

+3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.99%

-0.60%

Volatility

XTOC vs. QTOC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) is 2.15%, while Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October (QTOC) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that XTOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTOCQTOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

3.07%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

10.42%

-2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.21%

12.64%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.09%

19.69%

-4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.09%

19.69%

-4.60%

XTOC vs. QTOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XTOC and QTOC have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

XTOC vs. QTOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTOC nor QTOC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XTOC and QTOC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QTOC has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to XTOC (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTOC dropped -24.09% vs QTOC's -33.43%.

On 3-year performance, QTOC leads with 18.31% vs 14.19% for XTOC. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, XTOC has been the lower-risk option at 2.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QTOC has performed better with a 18.31% return vs 14.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTOC and QTOC have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

XTOC and QTOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XTOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTOC and QTOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer