XTL vs. SGDM
XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) and SGDM (Sprott Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while SGDM is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XTL returned 16.27%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for SGDM. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XTL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SGDM.
Performance
XTL vs. SGDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTL achieves a 51.28% return, which is significantly higher than SGDM's -4.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XTL has outperformed SGDM with an annualized return of 16.27%, while SGDM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.84% annualized return.
XTL
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 51.28%
- 6M
- 51.62%
- 1Y
- 120.42%
- 3Y*
- 46.01%
- 5Y*
- 18.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.27%
SGDM
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -14.98%
- YTD
- -4.58%
- 6M
- -4.02%
- 1Y
- 43.72%
- 3Y*
- 37.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
XTL vs. SGDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 51.28% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -6.60% | 0.56% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | -4.58% | 153.46% | 12.14% | 2.34% | -8.23% | -9.15% | 21.85% | 44.27% | -15.14% | 10.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTL and SGDM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.17 |
The correlation between XTL and SGDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XTL vs. SGDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTL
SGDM
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XTL
SGDM
-
Communication Services
XTL
SGDM
-
Real Estate
XTL
SGDM
-
Basic Materials
XTL
-
SGDM
Consumer Cyclical
XTL
-
SGDM
-
Consumer Defensive
XTL
-
SGDM
-
Energy
XTL
-
SGDM
-
Financial Services
XTL
-
SGDM
-
Healthcare
XTL
-
SGDM
-
Industrials
XTL
-
SGDM
-
Utilities
XTL
-
SGDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTL vs. SGDM — Risk / Return Rank
XTL
SGDM
XTL vs. SGDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XTL | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.20 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.95 | 1.30 | +6.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.56 | 3.60 | +29.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XTL vs. SGDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTL drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, smaller than the maximum SGDM drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTL and SGDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTL | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.01% | -54.95% | +17.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.70% | -35.96% | +21.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -35.96% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.01% | -45.06% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.01% | -49.69% | +12.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -30.31% | +23.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -25.46% | +15.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 12.93% | -9.45% |
Volatility
XTL vs. SGDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) is 11.43%, while Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a volatility of 16.53%. This indicates that XTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTL | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.43% | 16.53% | -5.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.28% | 38.64% | -14.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.13% | 46.24% | -16.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.34% | 36.11% | -10.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 36.97% | -13.31% |
XTL vs. SGDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTL vs. SGDM - Dividend Comparison
XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than SGDM's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 1.09% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 0.86% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTL and SGDM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGDM has higher volatility (16.53%) compared to XTL (11.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTL dropped -37.01% vs SGDM's -54.95%.
On 10-year performance, XTL leads with 16.27% vs 11.84% for SGDM. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTL has been the lower-risk option at 11.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XTL has performed better with a 16.27% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDM.
SGDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.86% for XTL.
XTL is categorized as Communications Equities, while SGDM is Gold. XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while SGDM tracks Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTL and 0.50% for SGDM.
XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTL and SGDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer