XTL vs. QTUM
XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XTL returned 20.95%/yr vs 29.66%/yr for QTUM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XTL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
XTL vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTL achieves a 62.17% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's 54.21% return.
XTL
- 1D
- 3.28%
- 1M
- 8.43%
- YTD
- 62.17%
- 6M
- 70.46%
- 1Y
- 143.57%
- 3Y*
- 50.79%
- 5Y*
- 20.95%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
QTUM
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- 24.85%
- YTD
- 54.21%
- 6M
- 54.71%
- 1Y
- 98.68%
- 3Y*
- 52.52%
- 5Y*
- 29.66%
- 10Y*
- —
XTL vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 62.17% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -16.36% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 54.21% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTL and QTUM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.74 |
The correlation between XTL and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
XTL vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTL
QTUM
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XTL
QTUM
Communication Services
XTL
QTUM
Real Estate
XTL
QTUM
-
Basic Materials
XTL
-
QTUM
-
Consumer Cyclical
XTL
-
QTUM
Consumer Defensive
XTL
-
QTUM
-
Energy
XTL
-
QTUM
-
Financial Services
XTL
-
QTUM
-
Healthcare
XTL
-
QTUM
Industrials
XTL
-
QTUM
Utilities
XTL
-
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTL vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
XTL
QTUM
XTL vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.02 | 3.78 | +1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.29 | 4.36 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.57 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.91 | 6.65 | +3.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.66 | 25.13 | +20.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.02 | 3.78 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 1.12 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.08 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
XTL vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTL drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, roughly equal to the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTL and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.01% | -38.45% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.70% | -15.26% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -25.39% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.01% | -38.45% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.77% | -8.26% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 4.04% | -0.85% |
Volatility
XTL vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) is 8.05%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 9.64%. This indicates that XTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.05% | 9.64% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.61% | 20.35% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.78% | 26.27% | +2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 26.56% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.51% | 27.17% | -3.66% |
XTL vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTL vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than QTUM's 0.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 0.80% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTL and QTUM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to XTL (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTL dropped -37.01% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.66% vs 20.95% for XTL. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTL has been the lower-risk option at 8.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.66% return vs 20.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
XTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.70% for QTUM.
XTL is categorized as Communications Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTL and 0.40% for QTUM.
XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.02 vs 3.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTL and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer