XTL vs. EPU
XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) and EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while EPU is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Peru Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XTL returned 16.27%/yr vs 15.16%/yr for EPU. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XTL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EPU.
Performance
XTL vs. EPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTL achieves a 51.28% return, which is significantly higher than EPU's 21.02% return. Over the past 10 years, XTL has outperformed EPU with an annualized return of 16.27%, while EPU has yielded a comparatively lower 15.16% annualized return.
XTL
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 51.28%
- 6M
- 51.62%
- 1Y
- 120.42%
- 3Y*
- 46.01%
- 5Y*
- 18.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.27%
EPU
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 21.02%
- 6M
- 26.87%
- 1Y
- 85.51%
- 3Y*
- 46.38%
- 5Y*
- 28.15%
- 10Y*
- 15.16%
XTL vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 51.28% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -6.60% | 0.56% |
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 21.02% | 86.87% | 21.73% | 25.34% | 2.05% | -11.81% | -4.31% | 7.30% | -12.17% | 29.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTL and EPU is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011 | 0.40 |
XTL vs. EPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTL
EPU
Technology
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XTL
EPU
-
Communication Services
XTL
EPU
Real Estate
XTL
EPU
Basic Materials
XTL
-
EPU
Consumer Cyclical
XTL
-
EPU
Consumer Defensive
XTL
-
EPU
Energy
XTL
-
EPU
-
Financial Services
XTL
-
EPU
Healthcare
XTL
-
EPU
Industrials
XTL
-
EPU
Utilities
XTL
-
EPU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTL vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank
XTL
EPU
XTL vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XTL | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.43 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.95 | 4.07 | +3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.56 | 11.73 | +21.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XTL vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTL drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, smaller than the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTL and EPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTL | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.01% | -60.62% | +23.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.70% | -20.85% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -20.85% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.01% | -35.59% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.01% | -50.97% | +13.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -6.69% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -18.81% | +9.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 7.22% | -3.74% |
Volatility
XTL vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) is 11.43%, while iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a volatility of 13.52%. This indicates that XTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTL | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.43% | 13.52% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.28% | 26.94% | -2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.13% | 31.04% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.34% | 25.11% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 23.64% | +0.02% |
XTL vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EPU's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTL vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison
XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than EPU's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 1.35% | 1.63% | 5.78% | 4.17% | 5.56% | 3.13% | 1.91% | 2.67% | 1.53% | 3.30% | 0.85% | 1.90% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 0.86% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTL and EPU have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPU has higher volatility (13.52%) compared to XTL (11.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTL dropped -37.01% vs EPU's -60.62%.
On 10-year performance, XTL leads with 16.27% vs 15.16% for EPU. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTL has been the lower-risk option at 11.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XTL has performed better with a 16.27% return vs 15.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPU.
EPU has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.86% for XTL.
XTL is categorized as Communications Equities, while EPU is Mid Cap Blend Equities. XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTL and 0.59% for EPU.
XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTL and EPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer