XTJL vs. SCDL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) and SCDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. XTJL is actively managed, while SCDL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XTJL returned 9.55%/yr vs 11.62%/yr for SCDL. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XTJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SCDL.

Performance

XTJL vs. SCDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTJL achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly lower than SCDL's 47.30% return.

XTJL

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 5.49%
• YTD: 6.32%
• 1Y: 14.27%
• 3Y*: 13.98%
• 5Y*: 9.55%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.76%

SCDL

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 6.51%
• 6M: 26.03%
• YTD: 47.30%
• 1Y: 61.99%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 11.62%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN	$12.99K	$29.73K	$21.90K
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July	$26.11K	$26.81K	$267.40K

XTJL vs. SCDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July	6.32%	15.42%	14.43%	25.72%	-15.66%	7.81%
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN	47.30%	2.05%	14.99%	0.18%	-13.06%	16.14%

Correlation

The correlation between XTJL and SCDL is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between XTJL and SCDL has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

XTJL vs. SCDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XTJL

XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 79
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 84
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 89

SCDL

SCDL Risk / Return Rank: 94
SCDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
SCDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SCDL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SCDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SCDL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XTJL vs. SCDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XTJL	SCDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	2.81	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	3.97	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.46	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	6.00	-3.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.07	15.42	-1.35

XTJL vs. SCDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTJL Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the SCDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTJL and SCDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XTJL vs. SCDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTJL drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, smaller than the maximum SCDL drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJL and SCDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTJL	SCDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.24%	-34.87%	+11.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.12%	-10.19%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.70%	-32.79%	+16.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.24%	-34.87%	+11.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-2.42%	+2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.92%	-11.68%	+7.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	3.96%	-3.03%

Volatility

XTJL vs. SCDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) is 2.90%, while ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that XTJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTJL	SCDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	8.22%	-5.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.12%	15.67%	-9.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.79%	21.95%	-14.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.11%	29.02%	-13.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.03%	28.76%	-13.73%

XTJL vs. SCDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDL's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

XTJL vs. SCDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTJL nor SCDL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTJL and SCDL in my portfolio?

XTJL and SCDL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XTJL or SCDL?

SCDL has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to XTJL (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJL dropped -23.24% vs SCDL's -34.87%.

Which ETF is better, XTJL or SCDL?

On 5-year performance, SCDL leads with 11.62% vs 9.55% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTJL or SCDL?

Over the 5-year period, SCDL has performed better with a 11.62% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTJL or SCDL?

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTJL or SCDL?

XTJL and SCDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XTJL and SCDL?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTJL and 0.95% for SCDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.