PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTJL vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTJL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTJL achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.57% return.


XTJL

1D
0.76%
1M
0.96%
6M
5.49%
YTD
6.32%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.76%

QTAP

1D
0.27%
1M
0.15%
6M
12.76%
YTD
13.57%
1Y
20.30%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$235.81K$225.86K$220.48K
$26.11K$26.81K$267.40K

XTJL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
6.32%15.42%14.43%25.72%-15.66%7.81%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
13.57%19.36%17.34%43.32%-25.87%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between XTJL and QTAP is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.87

The correlation between XTJL and QTAP shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XTJL vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XTJL
QTAP

Technology

39.1%
50.7%

Financial Services

10.9%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.7%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
12.5%

Healthcare

8.3%
5.1%

Industrials

7.8%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
8.7%

Energy

3.1%
0.7%

Utilities

2.1%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.3%

Technology

XTJL
39.1%
QTAP
50.7%

Financial Services

XTJL
10.9%
QTAP
0.2%

Communication Services

XTJL
10.7%
QTAP
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XTJL
9.9%
QTAP
12.5%

Healthcare

XTJL
8.3%
QTAP
5.1%

Industrials

XTJL
7.8%
QTAP
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

XTJL
4.5%
QTAP
8.7%

Energy

XTJL
3.1%
QTAP
0.7%

Utilities

XTJL
2.1%
QTAP
1.6%

Real Estate

XTJL
1.8%
QTAP
0.1%

Basic Materials

XTJL
1.7%
QTAP
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTJL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XTJL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTJLQTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.69

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

6.93

-4.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.07

33.23

-19.17

XTJL vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTJL Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTJL and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTJL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTJL drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, smaller than the maximum QTAP drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJL and QTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTJLQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.24%

-29.44%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.12%

-2.81%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

-13.03%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.24%

-29.44%

+6.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-1.05%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-4.91%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.59%

+0.34%

Volatility

XTJL vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.75%. This indicates that XTJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTJLQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

2.75%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.12%

5.69%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.79%

6.61%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.11%

18.92%

-3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.03%

18.57%

-3.54%

XTJL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XTJL and QTAP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

XTJL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTJL nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XTJL and QTAP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTJL has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to QTAP (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJL dropped -23.24% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

On 5-year performance, QTAP leads with 12.30% vs 9.55% for XTJL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 12.30% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL and QTAP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

XTJL and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTJL and QTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer