PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTJL vs. GDMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XTJL vs. GDMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XTJL vs. GDMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
-1.36%15.42%14.43%25.72%-15.66%7.28%
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
5.56%25.29%7.44%1.72%-2.08%0.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTJL achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly lower than GDMA's 5.56% return.


XTJL

1D
2.47%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
-1.36%
6M
1.27%
1Y
15.57%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
10Y*

GDMA

1D
-0.16%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
5.56%
6M
8.64%
1Y
30.39%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XTJL vs. GDMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMA's 0.77% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XTJL vs. GDMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMA
GDMA Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GDMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMA Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMA Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTJL vs. GDMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTJLGDMADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

2.52

-1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.38

3.29

-1.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.48

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

4.72

-3.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.42

14.01

-6.59

XTJL vs. GDMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTJL Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the GDMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTJL and GDMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTJLGDMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.52

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.85

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between XTJL and GDMA is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XTJL vs. GDMA - Dividend Comparison

XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
2.65%2.79%2.32%4.14%1.18%2.10%0.62%3.17%

Drawdowns

XTJL vs. GDMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTJL drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, which is greater than GDMA's maximum drawdown of -16.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJL and GDMA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XTJLGDMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.24%

-16.66%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.81%

-6.44%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-6.06%

+3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-3.78%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.17%

+0.02%

Volatility

XTJL vs. GDMA - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) at 4.01%. This indicates that XTJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XTJLGDMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

4.01%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.27%

9.88%

-3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

12.12%

+6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.46%

9.44%

+6.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

10.82%

+4.64%