XTJL vs. BULZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) and BULZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. XTJL is actively managed, while BULZ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTJL returned 14.67%/yr vs 100.25%/yr for BULZ. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XTJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BULZ.

Performance

XTJL vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTJL achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly lower than BULZ's 92.22% return.

XTJL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 5.38%
• 6M: 6.35%
• 1Y: 15.58%
• 3Y*: 14.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BULZ

• 1D: -4.32%
• 1M: 33.43%
• YTD: 92.22%
• 6M: 82.15%
• 1Y: 239.73%
• 3Y*: 100.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTJL vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July	5.38%	15.42%	14.43%	25.72%	-15.66%	5.92%
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	92.22%	60.09%	54.09%	394.22%	-92.26%	12.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XTJL and BULZ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2021	0.82

The correlation between XTJL and BULZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

XTJL vs. BULZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XTJL	BULZ
Technology	36.2%	62.3%
Financial Services	11.9%	-
Communication Services	10.9%	25.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	12.8%
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Industrials	8.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.5%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

XTJL vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTJL

XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 72
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 85

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 75
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTJL vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XTJL	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	3.24	-1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	3.01	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.40	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	4.45	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.30	11.93	+5.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XTJL vs. BULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTJL Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the BULZ Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTJL and BULZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTJL	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	3.24	-1.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.18	+0.47

Drawdowns

XTJL vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTJL drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJL and BULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTJL	BULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.24%	-94.44%	+71.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.12%	-54.22%	+49.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.70%	-67.96%	+51.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-9.44%	+9.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.04%	-58.38%	+54.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	20.20%	-19.30%

Volatility

XTJL vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) is 0.31%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a volatility of 22.83%. This indicates that XTJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTJL	BULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.31%	22.83%	-22.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.72%	56.98%	-51.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.42%	74.46%	-67.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.21%	91.22%	-76.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.21%	91.22%	-76.01%

XTJL vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

XTJL vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTJL nor BULZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTJL and BULZ in my portfolio?

XTJL and BULZ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XTJL or BULZ?

BULZ has higher volatility (22.83%) compared to XTJL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJL dropped -23.24% vs BULZ's -94.44%.

Which ETF is better, XTJL or BULZ?

On 3-year performance, BULZ leads with 100.25% vs 14.67% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTJL or BULZ?

Over the 3-year period, BULZ has performed better with a 100.25% return vs 14.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTJL or BULZ?

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BULZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTJL or BULZ?

XTJL and BULZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XTJL and BULZ?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTJL and 0.95% for BULZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.