XTEN vs. TLTX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

XTEN (BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. XTEN is passively managed, while TLTX is actively managed. Over the past year, XTEN returned 3.98% vs 3.72% for TLTX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XTEN charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.

Performance

XTEN vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTEN achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -1.59% return.

XTEN

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -0.95%
• 6M: -1.27%
• YTD: -0.69%
• 1Y: 3.98%
• 3Y*: 1.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TLTX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -3.45%
• 6M: -2.30%
• YTD: -1.59%
• 1Y: 3.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTEN vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XTEN BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	-0.69%	4.94%
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF	-1.59%	6.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XTEN and TLTX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.63

The correlation between XTEN and TLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XTEN vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTEN

XTEN Risk / Return Rank: 21
XTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
XTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 19
XTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 21

TLTX

TLTX Risk / Return Rank: 16
TLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
TLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
TLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
TLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTEN vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XTEN	TLTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	0.40	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	0.64	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.08	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	0.59	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.88	1.32	+0.56

XTEN vs. TLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the TLTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTEN and TLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XTEN vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.86%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTEN and TLTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTEN	TLTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.86%	-6.35%	-7.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.42%	-6.35%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.66%	-5.23%	+1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-2.38%	-1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	2.83%	-0.71%

Volatility

XTEN vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) is 1.90%, while Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that XTEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTEN	TLTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.90%	2.87%	-0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.75%	6.92%	-2.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.22%	9.24%	-3.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.48%	9.24%	+0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.48%	9.24%	+0.24%

XTEN vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTEN has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

XTEN vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison

XTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than TLTX's 17.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF	17.73%	7.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XTEN BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	4.37%	4.05%	4.21%	3.71%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTEN and TLTX in my portfolio?

XTEN and TLTX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XTEN or TLTX?

TLTX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to XTEN (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTEN dropped -13.86% vs TLTX's -6.35%.

Which ETF is better, XTEN or TLTX?

On 1-year performance, XTEN leads with 3.98% vs 3.72% for TLTX. On fees, XTEN is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, XTEN has been the lower-risk option at 1.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTEN or TLTX?

Over the 1-year period, XTEN has performed better with a 3.98% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTEN or TLTX?

XTEN is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTEN or TLTX?

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.73%, compared with 4.37% for XTEN.

What is the main difference between XTEN and TLTX?

They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XTEN and 0.29% for TLTX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XTEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.