XT vs. ASMH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net) while ASMH tracks the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XT returned 32.86% vs 143.52% for ASMH. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XT charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

XT vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 71.44% return.

XT

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -0.81%
• 6M: 12.84%
• YTD: 16.32%
• 1Y: 32.86%
• 3Y*: 15.12%
• 5Y*: 7.44%
• 10Y*: 14.17%

ASMH

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 36.58%
• YTD: 71.44%
• 1Y: 143.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XT vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	16.32%	37.40%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	71.44%	59.22%

Correlation

The correlation between XT and ASMH is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.63

The correlation between XT and ASMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XT vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XT

XT Risk / Return Rank: 74
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 80

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 95
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XT vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XT	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	3.37	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	3.73	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.45	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	9.79	-6.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.16	28.17	-16.01

XT vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XT Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the ASMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XT and ASMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XT vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XT	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.41%	-15.89%	-18.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.45%	-14.75%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.69%	-10.51%	+6.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.36%	-4.41%	-2.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	5.17%	-2.46%

Volatility

XT vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) is 5.65%, while ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a volatility of 18.11%. This indicates that XT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XT	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.65%	18.11%	-12.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.16%	34.14%	-19.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.51%	43.78%	-26.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.05%	41.26%	-20.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.09%	41.26%	-21.17%

XT vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XT has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

XT vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than ASMH's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.63%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	7.05%	7.95%	0.66%	0.41%	0.78%	0.84%	0.77%	1.55%	1.40%	0.97%	1.37%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XT and ASMH in my portfolio?

XT and ASMH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XT or ASMH?

ASMH has higher volatility (18.11%) compared to XT (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs ASMH's -15.89%.

Which ETF is better, XT or ASMH?

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 143.52% vs 32.86% for XT. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XT or ASMH?

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 143.52% return vs 32.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XT or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XT or ASMH?

XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.05%, compared with 1.63% for ASMH.

What is the main difference between XT and ASMH?

XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for XT and 0.19% for ASMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.