PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSW vs. XT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSW vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 15.73% return. Over the past 10 years, XSW has underperformed XT with an annualized return of 12.80%, while XT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.88% annualized return.


XSW

1D
0.86%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
-13.68%
6M
-15.49%
1Y
-10.86%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
-1.20%
10Y*
12.80%

XT

1D
-2.84%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
15.73%
6M
14.43%
1Y
37.71%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
14.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSW vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSW
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF
-13.68%-0.90%25.81%38.60%-34.22%7.47%52.41%36.50%7.67%27.94%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
15.73%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%16.43%35.10%30.74%-4.93%33.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XSW and XT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between XSW and XT has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XSW vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSW
XT

Technology

85.9%
46.7%

Financial Services

9.0%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.7%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
7.4%

Healthcare

0.8%
24.1%

Industrials

0.6%
7.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

4.9%

Technology

XSW
85.9%
XT
46.7%

Financial Services

XSW
9.0%
XT
3.0%

Communication Services

XSW
2.7%
XT
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XSW
1.1%
XT
7.4%

Healthcare

XSW
0.8%
XT
24.1%

Industrials

XSW
0.6%
XT
7.7%

Basic Materials

XSW

-

XT
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

XSW

-

XT
0.0%

Energy

XSW

-

XT
0.4%

Real Estate

XSW

-

XT
0.0%

Utilities

XSW

-

XT
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSW vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSW
XSW Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
XSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
XSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSW Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSW vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSWXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.38

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

3.63

-3.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

14.43

-15.10

XSW vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSW Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the XT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSW and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSW vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and XT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSWXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.38%

-34.41%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.75%

-10.45%

-23.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.75%

-22.09%

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.38%

-34.41%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.38%

-34.41%

-10.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.30%

-4.18%

-17.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-7.39%

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.31%

2.62%

+13.69%

Volatility

XSW vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 8.14%. This indicates that XSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSWXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.42%

8.14%

+3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.81%

13.78%

+10.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.83%

17.32%

+11.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.89%

21.00%

+7.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.26%

20.12%

+6.14%

XSW vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSW vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XSW
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF
0.00%0.06%0.07%0.20%0.09%0.13%0.26%0.12%0.31%0.46%0.87%0.54%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
7.08%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSW and XT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSW has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to XT (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs XT's -34.41%.

On 10-year performance, XT leads with 14.88% vs 12.80% for XSW. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 8.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XT has performed better with a 14.88% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.

XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.

XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.46% for XT.

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSW and XT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer