XSW vs. XT
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XSW tracks the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSW returned 13.25%/yr vs 14.27%/yr for XT. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
XSW vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -4.56% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 16.76% return. Over the past 10 years, XSW has underperformed XT with an annualized return of 13.25%, while XT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.27% annualized return.
XSW
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- 6M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- -3.96%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
XT
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- YTD
- 16.76%
- 1Y
- 33.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
XSW vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -4.56% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | 7.47% | 52.41% | 36.50% | 7.67% | 27.94% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 16.76% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 35.10% | 30.74% | -4.93% | 33.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and XT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XSW and XT has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XSW vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSW
XT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XSW
XT
Financial Services
XSW
XT
Communication Services
XSW
XT
Consumer Cyclical
XSW
XT
Healthcare
XSW
XT
Industrials
XSW
XT
Basic Materials
XSW
-
XT
Consumer Defensive
XSW
-
XT
Energy
XSW
-
XT
Real Estate
XSW
-
XT
Utilities
XSW
-
XT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
XT
XSW vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSW | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.34 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 3.25 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 12.61 | -12.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSW vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -34.41% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -10.45% | -23.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | -22.09% | -11.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | -34.41% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | -34.41% | -10.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.97% | -3.32% | -9.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.88% | -7.36% | -2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.67% | 2.69% | +13.98% |
Volatility
XSW vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 6.67%. This indicates that XSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 6.67% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.53% | 14.11% | +10.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.16% | 17.50% | +11.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.04% | 21.05% | +7.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.29% | 20.09% | +6.20% |
XSW vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 7.02% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and XT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSW has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to XT (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs XT's -34.41%.
On 10-year performance, XT leads with 14.27% vs 13.25% for XSW. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 6.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XT has performed better with a 14.27% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.
XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.46% for XT.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer