XSVT.DE vs. EM1C.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XSVT.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C) and EM1C.DE (VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSVT.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward, while EM1C.DE is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan GBI-Emerging Markets Global Core. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSVT.DE returned 16.36%/yr vs 4.00%/yr for EM1C.DE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSVT.DE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EM1C.DE.

Performance

XSVT.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) and VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSVT.DE achieves a 21.63% return, which is significantly higher than EM1C.DE's 2.30% return.

XSVT.DE

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 21.63%
• 6M: 26.61%
• 1Y: 43.07%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EM1C.DE

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 7.02%
• 3Y*: 4.00%
• 5Y*: 2.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSVT.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XSVT.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C	21.63%	14.36%	15.10%	-12.67%	14.63%
EM1C.DE VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF	2.30%	4.53%	3.69%	6.44%	-6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between XSVT.DE and EM1C.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2022	0.18

The correlation between XSVT.DE and EM1C.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XSVT.DE vs. EM1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSVT.DE

XSVT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 70
XSVT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
XSVT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XSVT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
XSVT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
XSVT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 61

EM1C.DE

EM1C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 41
EM1C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
EM1C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
EM1C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
EM1C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EM1C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSVT.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) and VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XSVT.DE	EM1C.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	1.39	+0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.12	+0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.26	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.58	2.04	+2.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.89	6.75	+4.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSVT.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSVT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the EM1C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSVT.DE and EM1C.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XSVT.DE	EM1C.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	1.39	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.09	+0.52

Drawdowns

XSVT.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSVT.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.57%, which is greater than EM1C.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVT.DE and EM1C.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSVT.DE	EM1C.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.57%	-18.83%	-8.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.35%	-3.42%	-5.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.97%	-7.20%	-8.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-8.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-0.85%	-0.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.41%	-8.00%	-6.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.95%	1.04%	+2.91%

Volatility

XSVT.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE) at 1.55%. This indicates that XSVT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EM1C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSVT.DE	EM1C.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	1.55%	+2.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.57%	4.15%	+11.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.53%	5.03%	+13.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.83%	7.03%	+11.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.83%	8.06%	+10.77%

XSVT.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSVT.DE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EM1C.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSVT.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSVT.DE nor EM1C.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EM1C.DE VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.19%
XSVT.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSVT.DE and EM1C.DE in my portfolio?

XSVT.DE and EM1C.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XSVT.DE or EM1C.DE?

On fees, XSVT.DE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSVT.DE or EM1C.DE?

XSVT.DE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EM1C.DE.

What is the main difference between XSVT.DE and EM1C.DE?

XSVT.DE is categorized as Commodities, while EM1C.DE is Emerging Markets Bonds. XSVT.DE tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward, while EM1C.DE tracks JP Morgan GBI-Emerging Markets Global Core. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XSVT.DE and 0.30% for EM1C.DE.