XSVT.DE vs. IUSQ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE).
XSVT.DE and IUSQ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSVT.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward. It was launched on Apr 9, 2010. IUSQ.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World (ACWI). It was launched on Oct 21, 2011. Both XSVT.DE and IUSQ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XSVT.DE or IUSQ.DE.
Key characteristics
| XSVT.DE | IUSQ.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.18% | 15.82% |
| 1Y Return | -3.11% | 20.62% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.20 | 2.12 |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.33% | 10.74% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.57% | -33.60% |
| Current Drawdown | -21.04% | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSVT.DE and IUSQ.DE is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
XSVT.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XSVT.DE achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than IUSQ.DE's 15.82% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSVT.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSVT.DE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XSVT.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XSVT.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSVT.DE nor IUSQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XSVT.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSVT.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.57%, smaller than the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVT.DE and IUSQ.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XSVT.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) at 4.33%. This indicates that XSVT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.