PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EM1C.DE vs. VGEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EM1C.DE vs. VGEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EM1C.DE having a 2.30% return and VGEM.DE slightly higher at 2.34%.


EM1C.DE

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.38%
YTD
2.30%
6M
2.32%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
2.23%
10Y*

VGEM.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
1.24%
YTD
2.34%
6M
1.63%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EM1C.DE vs. VGEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EM1C.DE
VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF
2.30%4.53%3.69%6.44%-4.38%-2.30%-6.16%12.05%-4.25%0.17%
VGEM.DE
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
2.34%-1.55%12.06%5.25%-10.22%5.82%-3.91%15.57%0.84%-1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EM1C.DE and VGEM.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.55

The correlation between EM1C.DE and VGEM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EM1C.DE vs. VGEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EM1C.DE
EM1C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EM1C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VGEM.DE
VGEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
VGEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VGEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EM1C.DE vs. VGEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EM1C.DEVGEM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.16

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

5.71

+1.05

EM1C.DE vs. VGEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EM1C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the VGEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EM1C.DE and VGEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EM1C.DEVGEM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.13

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.34

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.29

-0.20

Drawdowns

EM1C.DE vs. VGEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EM1C.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, roughly equal to the maximum VGEM.DE drawdown of -19.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EM1C.DE and VGEM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EM1C.DEVGEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.83%

-19.64%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.42%

-3.10%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.20%

-11.98%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.53%

-12.46%

+3.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-2.18%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-6.63%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.17%

-0.13%

Volatility

EM1C.DE vs. VGEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEM.DE) at 1.18%. This indicates that EM1C.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EM1C.DEVGEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

1.18%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.15%

3.96%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.03%

5.93%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.03%

7.89%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.06%

8.77%

-0.71%

EM1C.DE vs. VGEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EM1C.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VGEM.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EM1C.DE vs. VGEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

EM1C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGEM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EM1C.DE
VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGEM.DE
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.06%5.60%5.23%5.14%4.84%3.16%3.99%3.87%3.84%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


EM1C.DE and VGEM.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGEM.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EM1C.DE.

EM1C.DE tracks JP Morgan GBI-Emerging Markets Global Core, while VGEM.DE tracks Bloomberg EM USD Sovereign + Quasi-Sov. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EM1C.DE and 0.25% for VGEM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EM1C.DE and VGEM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer