XSVT.DE vs. ACWI
XSVT.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSVT.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSVT.DE returned 13.54%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for ACWI. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSVT.DE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
XSVT.DE vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XSVT.DE is traded in EUR, while ACWI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSVT.DE achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 13.73% return.
XSVT.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 14.01%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 6M
- 13.06%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
XSVT.DE vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSVT.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C | 10.76% | 14.36% | 15.10% | -12.67% | 15.08% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 13.73% | 7.89% | 25.20% | 18.61% | -9.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSVT.DE and ACWI is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2022 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSVT.DE vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
XSVT.DE
ACWI
XSVT.DE vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSVT.DE | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 3.87 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 15.91 | -10.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSVT.DE vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSVT.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.57%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVT.DE and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSVT.DE | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.57% | -45.79% | +18.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.82% | -7.11% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.97% | -20.51% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.59% | -1.32% | -9.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.49% | -6.41% | -8.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 1.73% | +4.49% |
Volatility
XSVT.DE vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) is 3.94%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that XSVT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSVT.DE | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 4.60% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.00% | 10.06% | +5.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.42% | 12.81% | +15.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 15.22% | +6.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 16.98% | +4.57% |
XSVT.DE vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSVT.DE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSVT.DE vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
XSVT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.45% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
XSVT.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSVT.DE and ACWI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSVT.DE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSVT.DE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
XSVT.DE is categorized as Commodities, while ACWI is Global Equities. XSVT.DE tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XSVT.DE and 0.32% for ACWI.
Find the right allocation for XSVT.DE and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer