PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSVN vs. TLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSVN vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSVN achieves a -1.18% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -3.02% return.


XSVN

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.14%
6M
-0.81%
YTD
-1.18%
1Y
0.90%
3Y*
3.12%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.18%

TLTX

1D
0.10%
1M
-3.42%
6M
-2.60%
YTD
-3.02%
1Y
-0.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$182.44K$196.39K$333.12K
$2.74M$3.08M$3.27M

XSVN vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XSVN and TLTX is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.57

The correlation between XSVN and TLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSVN vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XSVN
XSVN Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XSVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVN Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVN Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTX
TLTX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XSVN vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSVNTLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.00

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

-0.09

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.52

-0.19

+0.71

XSVN vs. TLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSVN Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the TLTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSVN and TLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSVN vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSVN drawdown since its inception was -9.45%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVN and TLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSVNTLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-6.70%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.01%

-6.70%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.34%

-6.60%

+3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-2.51%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

3.06%

-1.35%

Volatility

XSVN vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) is 1.20%, while Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that XSVN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSVNTLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

2.91%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.56%

7.29%

-3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.43%

9.46%

-5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.10%

9.42%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.10%

9.42%

-2.32%

XSVN vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSVN has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSVN vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison

XSVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than TLTX's 19.28% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TLTX
Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF
19.28%7.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSVN
BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.05%4.06%4.17%3.49%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSVN and TLTX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to XSVN (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVN dropped -9.45% vs TLTX's -6.70%.

On 1-year performance, XSVN leads with 0.90% vs -0.57% for TLTX. On fees, XSVN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, XSVN has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XSVN has performed better with a 0.90% return vs -0.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSVN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 19.28%, compared with 4.05% for XSVN.

They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XSVN and 0.29% for TLTX.

XSVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSVN and TLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer