XSVM vs. TSCSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX).
XSVM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. TSCSX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jul 1, 1996.
Performance
XSVM vs. TSCSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XSVM vs. TSCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 6.63% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 20.20% | -13.63% | 56.36% | 5.08% | 30.01% | -12.33% | 3.62% |
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | -0.43% | 2.36% | 12.73% | 12.47% | -10.94% | 24.22% | 22.87% | 27.92% | -10.52% | 21.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSVM achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly higher than TSCSX's -0.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XSVM having a 12.22% annualized return and TSCSX not far behind at 11.84%.
XSVM
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 6.63%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 22.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
TSCSX
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -7.00%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 12.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSVM vs. TSCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCSX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XSVM vs. TSCSX — Risk / Return Rank
XSVM
TSCSX
XSVM vs. TSCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSVM | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 0.60 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 1.00 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.13 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 0.93 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.69 | 3.34 | +2.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSVM | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.60 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.20 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.54 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.39 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between XSVM and TSCSX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XSVM vs. TSCSX - Dividend Comparison
XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than TSCSX's 2.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.99% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | 2.37% | 2.36% | 3.18% | 0.46% | 9.60% | 11.33% | 1.60% | 8.72% | 15.00% | 6.68% | 4.19% | 8.34% |
Drawdowns
XSVM vs. TSCSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, which is greater than TSCSX's maximum drawdown of -56.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and TSCSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSVM | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.57% | -56.66% | -5.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.35% | -14.31% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.21% | -27.04% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.02% | -41.63% | -7.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.23% | -8.75% | +3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.65% | -10.29% | -1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 4.00% | +0.11% |
Volatility
XSVM vs. TSCSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) is 5.34%, while Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that XSVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XSVM | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 7.15% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.20% | 12.82% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.34% | 22.30% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 21.69% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.07% | 22.10% | +2.97% |