PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSVM vs. HFMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSVM vs. HFMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSVM achieves a 27.31% return, which is significantly higher than HFMDX's 14.55% return. Over the past 10 years, XSVM has underperformed HFMDX with an annualized return of 13.04%, while HFMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.91% annualized return.


XSVM

1D
1.19%
1M
3.59%
6M
17.18%
YTD
27.31%
1Y
43.31%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
13.04%
ALL TIME*
9.38%

HFMDX

1D
-1.46%
1M
-3.33%
6M
8.43%
YTD
14.55%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
16.22%
10Y*
13.91%
ALL TIME*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$2.64M$2.37M$2.08M

XSVM vs. HFMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
27.31%7.47%2.30%20.20%-13.63%56.36%5.08%30.01%-12.33%3.62%
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
14.55%2.68%34.13%30.83%2.72%27.23%23.37%15.76%-23.52%20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XSVM and HFMDX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005

0.81

The correlation between XSVM and HFMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSVM vs. HFMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

HFMDX
HFMDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HFMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
HFMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XSVM vs. HFMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSVMHFMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.18

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

1.79

+2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.79

5.76

+8.03

XSVM vs. HFMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the HFMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSVM and HFMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSVM vs. HFMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, roughly equal to the maximum HFMDX drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and HFMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSVMHFMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.57%

-61.25%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-12.66%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.21%

-27.76%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

-27.76%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.02%

-56.14%

+7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-6.15%

+5.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.48%

-12.18%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

3.94%

-0.79%

Volatility

XSVM vs. HFMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) is 4.25%, while Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that XSVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSVMHFMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

5.25%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

16.56%

-4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

22.02%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

23.42%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.01%

25.14%

-0.13%

XSVM vs. HFMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSVM has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than HFMDX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSVM vs. HFMDX - Dividend Comparison

XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than HFMDX's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
0.63%0.72%18.84%9.61%21.66%1.73%0.00%0.00%40.95%18.56%0.64%0.91%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.73%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSVM and HFMDX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFMDX has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to XSVM (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVM dropped -62.57% vs HFMDX's -61.25%.

XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSVM and HFMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer