PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSVM vs. AVSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSVM vs. AVSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XSVM having a 20.98% return and AVSC slightly higher at 21.15%.


XSVM

1D
0.77%
1M
3.66%
YTD
20.98%
6M
18.82%
1Y
37.12%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
13.32%

AVSC

1D
-0.16%
1M
4.37%
YTD
21.15%
6M
19.08%
1Y
42.10%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSVM vs. AVSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
20.98%7.47%2.30%20.20%-15.60%
AVSC
Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF
21.15%9.42%7.75%19.68%-12.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XSVM and AVSC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022

0.94

The correlation between XSVM and AVSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSVM vs. AVSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

AVSC
AVSC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AVSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVSC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AVSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSVM vs. AVSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSVMAVSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

5.36

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.45

16.79

-5.34

XSVM vs. AVSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the AVSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSVM and AVSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSVM vs. AVSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, which is greater than AVSC's maximum drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and AVSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSVMAVSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.57%

-28.40%

-34.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-7.89%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.21%

-28.40%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.53%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.54%

-7.35%

-4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

2.51%

+0.74%

Volatility

XSVM vs. AVSC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSVMAVSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

4.70%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

11.99%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.54%

18.18%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

22.28%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.07%

22.28%

+2.79%

XSVM vs. AVSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSVM has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than AVSC's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSVM vs. AVSC - Dividend Comparison

XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than AVSC's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVSC
Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF
1.20%1.16%1.17%1.42%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.82%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XSVM and AVSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVSC has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to XSVM (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVM dropped -62.57% vs AVSC's -28.40%.

On 3-year performance, AVSC leads with 18.70% vs 17.66% for XSVM. On fees, AVSC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVSC has performed better with a 18.70% return vs 17.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVSC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.

XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.20% for AVSC.

XSVM is categorized as Momentum, while AVSC is Small Cap Value Equities. XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index, while AVSC tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for XSVM and 0.25% for AVSC.

AVSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSVM and AVSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer