PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSPX.L vs. SPXD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSPX.L vs. SPXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSPX.L is traded in GBp, while SPXD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPXD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XSPX.L having a 10.56% return and SPXD.L slightly higher at 10.89%.


XSPX.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
5.51%
YTD
10.56%
6M
10.49%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*
16.30%

SPXD.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
5.46%
YTD
10.89%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.23%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSPX.L vs. SPXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XSPX.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
10.56%9.46%27.43%19.97%-8.90%31.28%13.93%9.34%
SPXD.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist
10.89%9.16%27.77%20.57%-8.81%30.89%14.44%8.68%

Correlation

The correlation between XSPX.L and SPXD.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2019

0.93

The correlation between XSPX.L and SPXD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSPX.L vs. SPXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSPX.L
SPXD.L

Technology

35.6%
35.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.8%

Communication Services

11.2%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.5%

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

XSPX.L
35.6%
SPXD.L
35.6%

Financial Services

XSPX.L
11.8%
SPXD.L
11.8%

Communication Services

XSPX.L
11.2%
SPXD.L
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XSPX.L
10.1%
SPXD.L
10.1%

Healthcare

XSPX.L
8.5%
SPXD.L
8.5%

Industrials

XSPX.L
8.3%
SPXD.L
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

XSPX.L
4.9%
SPXD.L
4.9%

Energy

XSPX.L
3.5%
SPXD.L
3.5%

Utilities

XSPX.L
2.4%
SPXD.L
2.4%

Real Estate

XSPX.L
1.9%
SPXD.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

XSPX.L
1.8%
SPXD.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSPX.L vs. SPXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSPX.L
XSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXD.L
SPXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSPX.L vs. SPXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSPX.LSPXD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.45

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

4.02

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.33

13.73

+0.60

XSPX.L vs. SPXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the SPXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSPX.L and SPXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSPX.LSPXD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

2.46

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.99

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.92

+0.08

Drawdowns

XSPX.L vs. SPXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SPXD.L drawdown of -26.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPX.L and SPXD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSPX.LSPXD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.50%

-26.07%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-7.17%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.09%

-20.92%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.09%

-20.92%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.15%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-3.66%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.11%

-0.08%

Volatility

XSPX.L vs. SPXD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) is 2.62%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that XSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSPX.LSPXD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

3.41%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.15%

8.47%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49%

11.71%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.28%

15.31%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.53%

17.09%

-1.56%

XSPX.L vs. SPXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXD.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSPX.L vs. SPXD.L - Dividend Comparison

XSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
SPXD.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist
1.08%1.16%1.31%1.51%1.68%1.30%1.55%1.87%
XSPX.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, XSPX.L and SPXD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPXD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XSPX.L.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XSPX.L and 0.05% for SPXD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSPX.L and SPXD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer