SPXD.L vs. CSPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L).
SPXD.L and CSPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPXD.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Oct 26, 2015. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by Blackrock Financial Management that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. Both SPXD.L and CSPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPXD.L or CSPX.L.
Key characteristics
| SPXD.L | CSPX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.32% | 26.49% |
| 1Y Return | 34.52% | 34.76% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.12% | 10.01% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.67% | 15.51% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.05 | 3.01 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.19 | 4.17 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.57 | 1.57 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.47 | 4.49 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.36 | 19.30 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.80% | 1.78% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.54% | 11.52% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.98% | -33.90% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.14% | -0.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXD.L and CSPX.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SPXD.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPXD.L having a 26.32% return and CSPX.L slightly higher at 26.49%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPXD.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPXD.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPXD.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
SPXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while CSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXD.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist | 0.93% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.87% | 0.00% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SPXD.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.98%, roughly equal to the maximum CSPX.L drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXD.L and CSPX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPXD.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) have volatilities of 3.73% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.