XSPX.L vs. SUSW.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L).
XSPX.L and SUSW.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSPX.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Mar 26, 2010. SUSW.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 12, 2017. Both XSPX.L and SUSW.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XSPX.L or SUSW.L.
Key characteristics
| XSPX.L | SUSW.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.58% | 9.52% |
| 1Y Return | 20.96% | 15.08% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.30% | 7.10% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.81% | 11.82% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.79 | 1.50 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.35% | 11.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.50% | -32.09% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.07% | -1.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSPX.L and SUSW.L is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XSPX.L vs. SUSW.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XSPX.L achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly higher than SUSW.L's 9.52% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSPX.L vs. SUSW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SUSW.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XSPX.L vs. SUSW.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XSPX.L vs. SUSW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSPX.L nor SUSW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XSPX.L vs. SUSW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, smaller than the maximum SUSW.L drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPX.L and SUSW.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XSPX.L vs. SUSW.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) at 4.01%. This indicates that XSPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUSW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.