PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXD.L vs. FBCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXD.L vs. FBCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) and Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXD.L achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly lower than FBCVX's 16.16% return.


SPXD.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.50%
YTD
10.44%
6M
11.25%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*

FBCVX

1D
-0.10%
1M
3.95%
YTD
16.16%
6M
17.41%
1Y
29.31%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXD.L vs. FBCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPXD.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist
10.44%17.53%25.57%26.91%-18.50%29.67%17.90%13.21%
FBCVX
Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund
16.16%11.14%4.91%7.07%1.54%25.04%-4.72%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXD.L and FBCVX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2019

0.44

The correlation between SPXD.L and FBCVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXD.L vs. FBCVX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXD.L
FBCVX

Technology

35.6%
13.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
18.4%

Communication Services

11.2%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.4%

Healthcare

8.5%
12.7%

Industrials

8.3%
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.4%

Energy

3.5%
7.8%

Utilities

2.4%
3.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
4.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.1%

Technology

SPXD.L
35.6%
FBCVX
13.6%

Financial Services

SPXD.L
11.8%
FBCVX
18.4%

Communication Services

SPXD.L
11.2%
FBCVX
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXD.L
10.1%
FBCVX
8.4%

Healthcare

SPXD.L
8.5%
FBCVX
12.7%

Industrials

SPXD.L
8.3%
FBCVX
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPXD.L
4.9%
FBCVX
5.4%

Energy

SPXD.L
3.5%
FBCVX
7.8%

Utilities

SPXD.L
2.4%
FBCVX
3.4%

Real Estate

SPXD.L
1.9%
FBCVX
4.9%

Basic Materials

SPXD.L
1.8%
FBCVX
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXD.L vs. FBCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXD.L
SPXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FBCVX
FBCVX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FBCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXD.L vs. FBCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) and Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXD.LFBCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

3.12

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.56

12.46

+2.10

SPXD.L vs. FBCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the FBCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXD.L and FBCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXD.LFBCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.36

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.68

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.34

+0.60

Drawdowns

SPXD.L vs. FBCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.98%, smaller than the maximum FBCVX drawdown of -63.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXD.L and FBCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXD.LFBCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.98%

-63.75%

+29.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-9.29%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.29%

-14.82%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.17%

-14.82%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.10%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-10.69%

+5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.32%

-0.41%

Volatility

SPXD.L vs. FBCVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) is 3.10%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that SPXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXD.LFBCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

3.34%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

9.59%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

12.30%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

13.68%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.70%

17.09%

+0.61%

SPXD.L vs. FBCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCVX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXD.L vs. FBCVX - Dividend Comparison

SPXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than FBCVX's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBCVX
Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund
2.54%2.94%9.31%3.64%2.59%1.26%1.07%1.75%1.47%1.11%1.05%1.82%
SPXD.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist
1.08%1.16%1.31%1.51%1.68%1.30%1.55%1.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXD.L and FBCVX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXD.L and FBCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer