PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSNR.L vs. LYMZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSNR.L vs. LYMZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSNR.L is traded in GBp, while LYMZ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYMZ.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSNR.L achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than LYMZ.DE's 10.64% return. Over the past 10 years, XSNR.L has underperformed LYMZ.DE with an annualized return of 12.04%, while LYMZ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.94% annualized return.


XSNR.L

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
7.81%
6M
9.55%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
12.04%

LYMZ.DE

1D
1.49%
1M
9.04%
YTD
10.64%
6M
13.05%
1Y
29.77%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
17.31%
10Y*
16.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSNR.L vs. LYMZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSNR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
7.81%20.64%5.20%21.57%-14.54%21.19%12.17%27.37%-12.09%21.42%
LYMZ.DE
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF
10.64%47.11%10.19%38.66%-17.59%38.78%-11.16%56.41%-23.72%23.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XSNR.L and LYMZ.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.69

The correlation between XSNR.L and LYMZ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSNR.L vs. LYMZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSNR.L
XSNR.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XSNR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

LYMZ.DE
LYMZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LYMZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSNR.L vs. LYMZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSNR.LLYMZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.38

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

4.42

-0.09

XSNR.L vs. LYMZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSNR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the LYMZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSNR.L and LYMZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSNR.LLYMZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

0.95

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.49

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.47

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.13

+0.52

Drawdowns

XSNR.L vs. LYMZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSNR.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, smaller than the maximum LYMZ.DE drawdown of -80.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSNR.L and LYMZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSNR.LLYMZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-80.16%

+44.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.30%

-21.52%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.10%

-29.09%

+11.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.20%

-41.67%

+14.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-59.31%

+23.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.35%

-1.97%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-33.72%

+27.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

6.72%

-2.67%

Volatility

XSNR.L vs. LYMZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) is 6.25%, while Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that XSNR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYMZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSNR.LLYMZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

9.61%

-3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.20%

25.50%

-10.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

31.25%

-12.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.87%

34.66%

-15.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

35.45%

-16.56%

XSNR.L vs. LYMZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSNR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LYMZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSNR.L vs. LYMZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSNR.L nor LYMZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XSNR.L and LYMZ.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSNR.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSNR.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LYMZ.DE.

XSNR.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while LYMZ.DE is Leveraged Equities. XSNR.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while LYMZ.DE tracks EURO STOXX 50 Daily Leverage Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSNR.L and 0.40% for LYMZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSNR.L and LYMZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer