LYMZ.DE vs. HQU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO).
LYMZ.DE and HQU.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LYMZ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the EURO STOXX 50 Daily Leverage Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2007. HQU.TO is managed by Global X.
Performance
LYMZ.DE vs. HQU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LYMZ.DE vs. HQU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYMZ.DE Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF | -3.18% | 39.84% | 15.21% | 41.48% | -21.87% | 49.32% | -15.91% | 64.99% | -24.78% | 18.73% |
HQU.TO BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF | -13.04% | 17.08% | 37.46% | 112.31% | -62.08% | 64.80% | 72.06% | 93.52% | -14.08% | 58.06% |
Different Trading Currencies
LYMZ.DE is traded in EUR, while HQU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the HQU.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYMZ.DE achieves a -3.18% return, which is significantly higher than HQU.TO's -13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, LYMZ.DE has underperformed HQU.TO with an annualized return of 14.93%, while HQU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 25.80% annualized return.
LYMZ.DE
- 1D
- 5.93%
- 1M
- -8.77%
- YTD
- -3.18%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 15.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 16.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.93%
HQU.TO
- 1D
- 6.56%
- 1M
- -9.14%
- YTD
- -13.04%
- 6M
- -11.53%
- 1Y
- 25.62%
- 3Y*
- 28.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 25.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LYMZ.DE vs. HQU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
LYMZ.DE vs. HQU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LYMZ.DE
HQU.TO
LYMZ.DE vs. HQU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYMZ.DE | HQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | 0.66 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 1.23 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.18 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 1.19 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 3.83 | -1.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYMZ.DE | HQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 0.66 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.24 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.55 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.18 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between LYMZ.DE and HQU.TO is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LYMZ.DE vs. HQU.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYMZ.DE nor HQU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LYMZ.DE vs. HQU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYMZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.31%, which is greater than HQU.TO's maximum drawdown of -75.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMZ.DE and HQU.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYMZ.DE | HQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.31% | -95.76% | +11.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.56% | -25.85% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.28% | -64.83% | +20.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.87% | -64.83% | +0.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.34% | -20.43% | +6.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.46% | -55.79% | +15.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.32% | 7.95% | -1.63% |
Volatility
LYMZ.DE vs. HQU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) have volatilities of 13.04% and 12.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LYMZ.DE | HQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.04% | 12.69% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.93% | 25.87% | -3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.81% | 46.93% | -12.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.49% | 46.23% | -11.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.21% | 46.77% | -10.56% |