XSMO vs. XLI
XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSMO returned 15.17%/yr vs 14.15%/yr for XLI. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSMO charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLI.
Performance
XSMO vs. XLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 24.80% return, which is significantly higher than XLI's 13.90% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed XLI with an annualized return of 15.17%, while XLI has yielded a comparatively lower 14.15% annualized return.
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 24.80%
- 6M
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 37.87%
- 3Y*
- 24.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.65%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
XLI
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 25.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
XSMO vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 24.80% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.90% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSMO and XLI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005 | 0.75 |
The correlation between XSMO and XLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSMO vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSMO
XLI
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
XSMO
XLI
Industrials
XSMO
XLI
Healthcare
XSMO
XLI
-
Financial Services
XSMO
XLI
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSMO
XLI
Basic Materials
XSMO
XLI
-
Real Estate
XSMO
XLI
-
Communication Services
XSMO
XLI
-
Utilities
XSMO
XLI
Energy
XSMO
XLI
-
Consumer Defensive
XSMO
XLI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSMO vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank
XSMO
XLI
XSMO vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSMO | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.26 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 1.98 | +1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 7.82 | +5.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSMO vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, smaller than the maximum XLI drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and XLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSMO | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -62.26% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -12.21% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -18.49% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -21.64% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.39% | -42.33% | +2.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.24% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -9.20% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 3.09% | -0.46% |
Volatility
XSMO vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) at 6.22%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSMO | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 6.22% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.99% | 13.59% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 16.17% | +3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 17.55% | +5.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 20.04% | +4.11% |
XSMO vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSMO vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison
XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than XLI's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.52% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSMO and XLI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSMO has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to XLI (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs XLI's -62.26%.
On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 15.17% vs 14.15% for XLI. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLI has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 15.17% return vs 14.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.
XLI has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.52% for XSMO.
XSMO is categorized as Momentum, while XLI is Industrials Equities. XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.08% for XLI.
XSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSMO and XLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer