XSMO vs. SOXX
XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSMO returned 15.17%/yr vs 35.55%/yr for SOXX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSMO charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
XSMO vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 24.80% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 98.11% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 15.17%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.55% annualized return.
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 24.80%
- 6M
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 37.87%
- 3Y*
- 24.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.65%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
SOXX
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 12.49%
- YTD
- 98.11%
- 6M
- 99.51%
- 1Y
- 171.57%
- 3Y*
- 53.00%
- 5Y*
- 33.69%
- 10Y*
- 35.55%
XSMO vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 24.80% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 98.11% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSMO and SOXX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XSMO and SOXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSMO vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSMO
SOXX
Technology
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
XSMO
SOXX
Industrials
XSMO
SOXX
-
Healthcare
XSMO
SOXX
-
Financial Services
XSMO
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSMO
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
XSMO
SOXX
-
Real Estate
XSMO
SOXX
-
Communication Services
XSMO
SOXX
-
Utilities
XSMO
SOXX
-
Energy
XSMO
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
XSMO
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSMO vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
XSMO
SOXX
XSMO vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSMO | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.62 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 10.50 | -6.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 38.20 | -24.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSMO vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSMO | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -70.21% | +12.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -15.77% | +6.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -41.36% | +16.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -45.75% | +16.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.39% | -45.75% | +6.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.16% | +3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -19.95% | +8.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 4.33% | -1.70% |
Volatility
XSMO vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) is 7.71%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 19.42%. This indicates that XSMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSMO | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 19.42% | -11.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.99% | 31.46% | -16.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 37.35% | -17.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 36.73% | -14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 33.77% | -9.62% |
XSMO vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSMO vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than SOXX's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.52% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSMO and SOXX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (19.42%) compared to XSMO (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.55% vs 15.17% for XSMO. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, XSMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.55% return vs 15.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.
XSMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.
XSMO is categorized as Momentum, while SOXX is Semiconductors. XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.43 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSMO and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer