PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSMO vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSMO vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 20.54% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 14.34%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.65% annualized return.


XSMO

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
20.54%
6M
18.72%
1Y
30.63%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
14.34%

SCHD

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.12%
YTD
18.71%
6M
19.28%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSMO vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
20.54%9.80%17.45%21.55%-15.44%19.24%21.96%28.65%-3.44%23.95%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.71%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between XSMO and SCHD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.67

The correlation between XSMO and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSMO vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSMO
SCHD

Technology

20.9%
16.4%

Industrials

19.5%
7.5%

Healthcare

13.9%
18.8%

Financial Services

12.3%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
6.3%

Basic Materials

5.8%
1.2%

Real Estate

5.0%

-

Communication Services

4.1%
6.3%

Utilities

4.0%
0.0%

Energy

3.1%
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
19.2%

Technology

XSMO
20.9%
SCHD
16.4%

Industrials

XSMO
19.5%
SCHD
7.5%

Healthcare

XSMO
13.9%
SCHD
18.8%

Financial Services

XSMO
12.3%
SCHD
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XSMO
9.0%
SCHD
6.3%

Basic Materials

XSMO
5.8%
SCHD
1.2%

Real Estate

XSMO
5.0%
SCHD

-

Communication Services

XSMO
4.1%
SCHD
6.3%

Utilities

XSMO
4.0%
SCHD
0.0%

Energy

XSMO
3.1%
SCHD
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

XSMO
2.4%
SCHD
19.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSMO vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSMO
XSMO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
XSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSMO vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSMOSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

5.74

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.75

14.06

-2.31

XSMO vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSMO and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSMOSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.43

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.59

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.76

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.86

-0.47

Drawdowns

XSMO vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSMOSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.06%

-33.37%

-24.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-4.61%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-16.13%

-8.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-16.85%

-12.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.39%

-33.37%

-6.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-1.64%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-3.32%

-7.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

1.88%

+0.73%

Volatility

XSMO vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.83%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSMOSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

2.83%

+3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.49%

7.60%

+6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.01%

10.94%

+8.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.68%

14.38%

+8.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.14%

16.72%

+7.42%

XSMO vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSMO vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.54%0.75%0.63%0.96%1.19%0.30%0.82%0.69%0.66%0.27%0.30%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSMO and SCHD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSMO has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 14.34% vs 12.65% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 14.34% return vs 12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.54% for XSMO.

XSMO is categorized as Momentum, while SCHD is Dividend. XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSMO and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer