XSLV vs. ONEV
XSLV (Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF) and ONEV (SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF) are both Low Volatility funds - XSLV tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index while ONEV tracks the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSLV returned 6.00%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for ONEV. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XSLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ONEV.
Performance
XSLV vs. ONEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 16.90% return, which is significantly higher than ONEV's 12.07% return. Over the past 10 years, XSLV has underperformed ONEV with an annualized return of 6.00%, while ONEV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.33% annualized return.
XSLV
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 12.18%
- YTD
- 16.90%
- 1Y
- 23.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.97%
- 10Y*
- 6.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.21%
ONEV
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- YTD
- 12.07%
- 1Y
- 17.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.92%
- 5Y*
- 8.81%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.03M | $3.31M | $4.42M | |
| $818.81K | $536.56K | $433.11K |
XSLV vs. ONEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSLV Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF | 16.90% | 0.31% | 9.81% | 1.34% | -11.83% | 29.34% | -17.40% | 22.35% | -5.41% | 8.57% |
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 12.07% | 8.14% | 11.76% | 13.28% | -8.15% | 29.19% | 6.66% | 30.66% | -5.30% | 18.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSLV and ONEV is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.77 |
The correlation between XSLV and ONEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSLV vs. ONEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSLV
ONEV
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Technology
Financial Services
XSLV
ONEV
Real Estate
XSLV
ONEV
Utilities
XSLV
ONEV
Industrials
XSLV
ONEV
Consumer Defensive
XSLV
ONEV
Basic Materials
XSLV
ONEV
Healthcare
XSLV
ONEV
Consumer Cyclical
XSLV
ONEV
Communication Services
XSLV
ONEV
Energy
XSLV
ONEV
Technology
XSLV
ONEV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSLV vs. ONEV — Risk / Return Rank
XSLV
ONEV
XSLV vs. ONEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSLV | ONEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.26 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.19 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.88 | 7.57 | +1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSLV vs. ONEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, which is greater than ONEV's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and ONEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSLV | ONEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.34% | -39.72% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.46% | -7.75% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.35% | -14.81% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.72% | -18.52% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.34% | -39.72% | -4.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -2.27% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | -3.85% | -3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.24% | +0.27% |
Volatility
XSLV vs. ONEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) is 4.04%, while SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that XSLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSLV | ONEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 4.58% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 8.49% | +0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 11.54% | +1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 14.59% | +2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 17.03% | +2.90% |
XSLV vs. ONEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEV's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSLV vs. ONEV - Dividend Comparison
XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than ONEV's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.80% | 1.44% | 1.87% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 6.91% | 3.73% | 0.21% |
XSLV Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF | 2.06% | 2.14% | 2.55% | 2.35% | 2.78% | 1.05% | 2.49% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 1.87% | 1.96% | 2.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSLV and ONEV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONEV has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to XSLV (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs ONEV's -39.72%.
On 10-year performance, ONEV leads with 11.33% vs 6.00% for XSLV. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XSLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ONEV has performed better with a 11.33% return vs 6.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XSLV.
XSLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.80% for ONEV.
XSLV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.20% for ONEV.
XSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSLV and ONEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer