PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLV vs. LGLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLV vs. LGLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly higher than LGLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, XSLV has underperformed LGLV with an annualized return of 6.15%, while LGLV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.29% annualized return.


XSLV

1D
1.45%
1M
3.35%
YTD
11.98%
6M
11.04%
1Y
15.35%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
6.15%

LGLV

1D
0.86%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
2.78%
6M
2.23%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
11.54%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLV vs. LGLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
11.98%0.31%9.81%1.34%-11.83%29.34%-17.40%22.35%-5.41%8.57%
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.78%8.37%16.22%9.19%-8.17%27.95%7.42%30.83%0.32%17.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLV and LGLV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013

0.71

The correlation between XSLV and LGLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSLV vs. LGLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSLV
LGLV

Financial Services

43.2%
9.9%

Real Estate

28.5%
17.6%

Utilities

9.1%
11.6%

Industrials

7.2%
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
5.8%

Basic Materials

2.7%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
9.1%

Healthcare

1.5%
7.1%

Communication Services

1.1%
4.3%

Technology

0.9%
9.4%

Energy

0.8%
3.5%

Financial Services

XSLV
43.2%
LGLV
9.9%

Real Estate

XSLV
28.5%
LGLV
17.6%

Utilities

XSLV
9.1%
LGLV
11.6%

Industrials

XSLV
7.2%
LGLV
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

XSLV
3.9%
LGLV
5.8%

Basic Materials

XSLV
2.7%
LGLV
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XSLV
2.3%
LGLV
9.1%

Healthcare

XSLV
1.5%
LGLV
7.1%

Communication Services

XSLV
1.1%
LGLV
4.3%

Technology

XSLV
0.9%
LGLV
9.4%

Energy

XSLV
0.8%
LGLV
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLV vs. LGLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLV
XSLV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

LGLV
LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLV vs. LGLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSLVLGLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.10

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

0.76

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.87

1.80

+4.08

XSLV vs. LGLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the LGLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLV and LGLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSLV vs. LGLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, which is greater than LGLV's maximum drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and LGLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLVLGLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-36.64%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-6.86%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-10.17%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-17.49%

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.34%

-36.64%

-7.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.79%

+4.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-3.22%

-4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.90%

-0.28%

Volatility

XSLV vs. LGLV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) at 3.51%. This indicates that XSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLVLGLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

3.51%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

7.00%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

9.57%

+3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

12.94%

+3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

16.07%

+3.87%

XSLV vs. LGLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLV's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSLV vs. LGLV - Dividend Comparison

XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than LGLV's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.09%1.94%1.93%2.03%1.95%1.65%1.98%1.89%2.09%4.39%2.54%2.97%
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
2.15%2.14%2.55%2.35%2.78%1.05%2.49%2.43%2.75%1.87%1.96%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLV and LGLV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSLV has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to LGLV (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs LGLV's -36.64%.

On 10-year performance, LGLV leads with 11.29% vs 6.15% for XSLV. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, LGLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, LGLV has performed better with a 11.29% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XSLV.

XSLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 2.09% for LGLV.

XSLV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while LGLV tracks SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.12% for LGLV.

XSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLV and LGLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer