PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLV vs. FDLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLV vs. FDLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than FDLO's 6.18% return.


XSLV

1D
0.24%
1M
2.52%
6M
11.86%
YTD
14.75%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
5.75%

FDLO

1D
0.23%
1M
1.82%
6M
4.29%
YTD
6.18%
1Y
13.30%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLV vs. FDLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
14.75%0.31%9.81%1.34%-11.83%29.34%-17.40%22.35%-5.41%8.57%
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
6.18%11.77%16.06%16.38%-10.38%24.00%12.19%31.10%-0.26%20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLV and FDLO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016

0.68

The correlation between XSLV and FDLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSLV vs. FDLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSLV
FDLO

Financial Services

43.2%
12.1%

Real Estate

28.5%
2.2%

Utilities

9.1%
2.2%

Industrials

7.2%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.6%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
10.1%

Healthcare

1.5%
9.6%

Communication Services

1.1%
10.6%

Technology

0.9%
35.5%

Energy

0.8%
3.2%

Financial Services

XSLV
43.2%
FDLO
12.1%

Real Estate

XSLV
28.5%
FDLO
2.2%

Utilities

XSLV
9.1%
FDLO
2.2%

Industrials

XSLV
7.2%
FDLO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

XSLV
3.9%
FDLO
4.6%

Basic Materials

XSLV
2.7%
FDLO
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XSLV
2.3%
FDLO
10.1%

Healthcare

XSLV
1.5%
FDLO
9.6%

Communication Services

XSLV
1.1%
FDLO
10.6%

Technology

XSLV
0.9%
FDLO
35.5%

Energy

XSLV
0.8%
FDLO
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLV vs. FDLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLV
XSLV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLV vs. FDLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSLVFDLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.27

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

1.87

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

7.60

-1.10

XSLV vs. FDLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the FDLO Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLV and FDLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSLV vs. FDLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, which is greater than FDLO's maximum drawdown of -34.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and FDLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLVFDLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-34.35%

-9.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-7.13%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-13.68%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-19.23%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.06%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-3.36%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.75%

+0.81%

Volatility

XSLV vs. FDLO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) at 3.01%. This indicates that XSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLVFDLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

3.01%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

6.87%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.28%

8.94%

+4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

13.10%

+3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

15.46%

+4.45%

XSLV vs. FDLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FDLO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSLV vs. FDLO - Dividend Comparison

XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than FDLO's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.40%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%0.00%
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
2.10%2.14%2.55%2.35%2.78%1.05%2.49%2.43%2.75%1.87%1.96%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLV and FDLO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSLV has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to FDLO (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs FDLO's -34.35%.

On 5-year performance, FDLO leads with 9.29% vs 4.94% for XSLV. On fees, FDLO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDLO has performed better with a 9.29% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDLO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XSLV.

XSLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.40% for FDLO.

XSLV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.15% for FDLO.

FDLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLV and FDLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer