XSLV vs. CIL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XSLV (Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSLV is a Low Volatility fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while CIL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSLV returned 6.00%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for CIL. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XSLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

XSLV vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 16.90% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, XSLV has underperformed CIL with an annualized return of 6.00%, while CIL has yielded a comparatively higher 8.18% annualized return.

XSLV

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 1.52%
• 6M: 12.18%
• YTD: 16.90%
• 1Y: 23.10%
• 3Y*: 10.59%
• 5Y*: 4.97%
• 10Y*: 6.00%
• ALL TIME*: 8.21%

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 1Y: 16.21%
• 3Y*: 14.57%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: 8.18%
• ALL TIME*: 7.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
XSLV Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF	$818.81K	$536.56K	$433.11K

XSLV vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XSLV Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF	16.90%	0.31%	9.81%	1.34%	-11.83%	29.34%	-17.40%	22.35%	-5.41%	8.57%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	-16.00%	11.07%	7.21%	19.13%	-13.34%	27.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLV and CIL is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2015	0.46

The correlation between XSLV and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.51 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSLV vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XSLV	CIL
Financial Services	43.9%	24.8%
Real Estate	27.4%	2.2%
Utilities	9.2%	6.6%
Industrials	7.2%	18.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	8.8%
Basic Materials	2.7%	6.6%
Healthcare	1.7%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	1.5%	8.2%
Communication Services	1.1%	5.8%
Energy	1.0%	4.6%
Technology	1.0%	6.4%

Return for Risk

XSLV vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XSLV

XSLV Risk / Return Rank: 75
XSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
XSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 69
XSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
XSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 93
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XSLV vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XSLV	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	2.51	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	3.80	-1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.67	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	3.69	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.88	18.41	-9.53

XSLV vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLV and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XSLV vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, which is greater than CIL's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSLV	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.34%	-36.27%	-8.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.46%	-4.60%	-2.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.35%	-11.29%	-7.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.72%	-29.89%	+5.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.34%	-36.27%	-8.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-0.58%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.21%	-6.47%	-0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	1.03%	+1.48%

Volatility

XSLV vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that XSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSLV	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.04%	0.00%	+4.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.46%	2.31%	+7.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.39%	6.80%	+6.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	16.39%	+0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.93%	16.74%	+3.19%

XSLV vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSLV vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than CIL's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.05%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
XSLV Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF	2.06%	2.14%	2.55%	2.35%	2.78%	1.05%	2.49%	2.43%	2.75%	1.87%	1.96%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSLV and CIL in my portfolio?

XSLV and CIL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XSLV or CIL?

XSLV has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, XSLV or CIL?

On 10-year performance, CIL leads with 8.18% vs 6.00% for XSLV. On fees, XSLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XSLV or CIL?

Over the 10-year period, CIL has performed better with a 8.18% return vs 6.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSLV or CIL?

XSLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XSLV or CIL?

XSLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.05% for CIL.

What is the main difference between XSLV and CIL?

XSLV is categorized as Low Volatility, while CIL is Foreign Large Cap Equities. XSLV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.45% for CIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.