PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLR.DE vs. SLVP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLR.DE vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSLR.DE is traded in EUR, while SLVP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XSLR.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

SLVP

1D
-0.24%
1M
-12.29%
6M
-28.48%
YTD
-12.94%
1Y
69.47%
3Y*
40.86%
5Y*
17.13%
10Y*
8.34%
ALL TIME*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLR.DE vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XSLR.DE and SLVP is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLR.DE vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLR.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SLVP
SLVP Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SLVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVP Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVP Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLR.DE vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSLR.DESLVPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.15

XSLR.DE vs. SLVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSLR.DE vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLR.DE drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -75.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLR.DE and SLVP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLR.DESLVPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-75.87%

+75.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-36.79%

+36.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-39.12%

+39.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.77%

Volatility

XSLR.DE vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLR.DESLVPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.19%

53.76%

-46.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.19%

40.92%

-33.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.19%

40.38%

-33.19%

XSLR.DE vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSLR.DE vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison

XSLR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
2.44%1.78%1.05%0.88%0.63%1.63%2.39%2.03%1.28%0.85%2.32%0.72%
XSLR.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, XSLR.DE and SLVP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XSLR.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSLR.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.

XSLR.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSLR.DE and 0.39% for SLVP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLR.DE and SLVP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer