XSLR.DE vs. EGLN.L
XSLR.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities) and EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XSLR.DE is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while EGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSLR.DE returned 22.38%/yr vs 19.69%/yr for EGLN.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSLR.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EGLN.L.
Performance
XSLR.DE vs. EGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSLR.DE achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than EGLN.L's 4.83% return.
XSLR.DE
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- 29.60%
- 1Y
- 110.52%
- 3Y*
- 42.16%
- 5Y*
- 22.38%
- 10Y*
- —
EGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- 30.19%
- 3Y*
- 28.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- —
XSLR.DE vs. EGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSLR.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities | -2.22% | 129.87% | 30.90% | -4.25% | 10.74% | -6.08% | 32.02% |
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 4.83% | 46.01% | 34.32% | 9.37% | 6.00% | 3.85% | -1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSLR.DE and EGLN.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020 | 0.67 |
The correlation between XSLR.DE and EGLN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSLR.DE vs. EGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSLR.DE
EGLN.L
XSLR.DE vs. EGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSLR.DE | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.80 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | 4.58 | +1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSLR.DE | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.30 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 1.22 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.95 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
XSLR.DE vs. EGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSLR.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.56%, which is greater than EGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLR.DE and EGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSLR.DE | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.56% | -18.35% | -20.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.56% | -16.70% | -21.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.56% | -16.70% | -21.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.56% | -16.70% | -21.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.47% | -15.21% | -18.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -6.34% | -5.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.90% | 6.57% | +11.33% |
Volatility
XSLR.DE vs. EGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.38% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) at 5.42%. This indicates that XSLR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSLR.DE | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.38% | 5.42% | +10.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.92% | 20.15% | +31.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.45% | 23.14% | +31.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.34% | 16.17% | +17.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.14% | 14.38% | +18.76% |
XSLR.DE vs. EGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSLR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSLR.DE vs. EGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSLR.DE nor EGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XSLR.DE and EGLN.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSLR.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSLR.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EGLN.L.
XSLR.DE is categorized as Silver, while EGLN.L is Gold. XSLR.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price, while EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSLR.DE and 0.25% for EGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for XSLR.DE and EGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer