PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLR.DE vs. 4GLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLR.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLR.DE achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than 4GLD.DE's 2.80% return.


XSLR.DE

1D
0.40%
1M
0.98%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
29.60%
1Y
110.52%
3Y*
42.16%
5Y*
22.38%
10Y*

4GLD.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
2.80%
6M
6.42%
1Y
30.27%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
19.85%
10Y*
13.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLR.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XSLR.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities
-2.22%129.87%30.90%-4.25%10.74%-6.08%32.02%
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
2.80%49.32%34.57%9.32%7.12%4.03%-1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLR.DE and 4GLD.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2020

0.69

The correlation between XSLR.DE and 4GLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLR.DE vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLR.DE
XSLR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

4GLD.DE
4GLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLR.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSLR.DE4GLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.82

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

4.63

+1.52

XSLR.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the 4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLR.DE and 4GLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSLR.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.31

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.23

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.65

+0.11

Drawdowns

XSLR.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLR.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.56%, roughly equal to the maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLR.DE and 4GLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLR.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.56%

-36.79%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.56%

-16.54%

-22.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.56%

-16.54%

-22.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.56%

-16.54%

-22.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.47%

-14.95%

-18.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.27%

-11.83%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.90%

6.52%

+11.38%

Volatility

XSLR.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.38% compared to Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) at 5.09%. This indicates that XSLR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLR.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.38%

5.09%

+11.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.92%

20.09%

+31.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.45%

23.06%

+31.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.34%

16.00%

+17.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.14%

14.37%

+18.77%

XSLR.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSLR.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSLR.DE nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLR.DE and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSLR.DE.

XSLR.DE is categorized as Silver, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. XSLR.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price, while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSLR.DE and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLR.DE and 4GLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer