XSLE.DE vs. SSLN.L
XSLE.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both Silver funds - XSLE.DE tracks the LBMA Silver Price (EUR Hedged) while SSLN.L tracks the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSLE.DE returned 16.90%/yr vs 22.83%/yr for SSLN.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSLE.DE charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.
Performance
XSLE.DE vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XSLE.DE is traded in EUR, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSLE.DE achieves a -5.59% return, which is significantly lower than SSLN.L's 4.10% return.
XSLE.DE
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- -5.59%
- 6M
- 25.87%
- 1Y
- 104.34%
- 3Y*
- 40.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.90%
- 10Y*
- —
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 29.61%
- 1Y
- 110.28%
- 3Y*
- 42.09%
- 5Y*
- 22.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.60%
XSLE.DE vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSLE.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities | -5.59% | 149.28% | 20.14% | -4.86% | 0.29% | -15.30% | 51.17% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 4.10% | 118.25% | 29.15% | -4.21% | 9.79% | -5.89% | 38.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSLE.DE and SSLN.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between XSLE.DE and SSLN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSLE.DE vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSLE.DE
SSLN.L
XSLE.DE vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XSLE.DE) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSLE.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 2.83 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | 6.17 | -0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSLE.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.01 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.68 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.18 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
XSLE.DE vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSLE.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -68.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLE.DE and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSLE.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.43% | -68.55% | +26.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.35% | -38.70% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.35% | -38.70% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.35% | -38.70% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.50% | -33.56% | -2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.29% | -42.68% | +24.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.25% | 17.82% | +1.43% |
Volatility
XSLE.DE vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XSLE.DE) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) have volatilities of 17.13% and 16.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSLE.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.13% | 16.51% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.94% | 51.99% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.40% | 54.61% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.13% | 33.72% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.05% | 29.61% | +5.44% |
XSLE.DE vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSLE.DE has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSLE.DE vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSLE.DE nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XSLE.DE and SSLN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for XSLE.DE.
XSLE.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price (EUR Hedged), while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for XSLE.DE and 0.20% for SSLN.L.
Find the right allocation for XSLE.DE and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer