XSIAX vs. BGT
XSIAX (Voya Senior Income Fund) and BGT (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 5 years, XSIAX returned 3.55%/yr vs 6.85%/yr for BGT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSIAX charges 1.51%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for BGT.
Performance
XSIAX vs. BGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSIAX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than BGT's -0.68% return.
XSIAX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 6.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- —
BGT
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- -1.74%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
XSIAX vs. BGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSIAX Voya Senior Income Fund | 0.73% | 4.91% | 7.42% | 14.32% | -10.33% | 5.87% | -5.85% | 5.70% | -1.20% | -0.66% |
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | -0.68% | -0.84% | 16.12% | 26.29% | -16.57% | 25.89% | -0.81% | 18.97% | -11.95% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSIAX and BGT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSIAX vs. BGT — Risk / Return Rank
XSIAX
BGT
XSIAX vs. BGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Senior Income Fund (XSIAX) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSIAX | BGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.98 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | -0.16 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.15 | -0.35 | +8.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSIAX | BGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | -0.17 | +1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.51 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.29 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
XSIAX vs. BGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSIAX drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum BGT drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSIAX and BGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSIAX | BGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.91% | -58.06% | +28.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.22% | -11.06% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.66% | -15.91% | +12.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.87% | -23.19% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -6.73% | +6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -8.12% | +4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 5.01% | -4.50% |
Volatility
XSIAX vs. BGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Voya Senior Income Fund (XSIAX) is 1.13%, while BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that XSIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSIAX | BGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 1.48% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.51% | 7.13% | -4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.15% | 10.35% | -7.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.03% | 13.57% | -9.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.51% | 15.34% | -9.83% |
XSIAX vs. BGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSIAX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is lower than BGT's 1.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSIAX vs. BGT - Dividend Comparison
XSIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than BGT's 13.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 13.54% | 12.74% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.03% | 6.04% |
XSIAX Voya Senior Income Fund | 6.63% | 6.38% | 8.83% | 9.44% | 4.34% | 3.56% | 4.13% | 4.47% | 5.63% | 1.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSIAX and BGT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGT has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to XSIAX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSIAX dropped -29.91% vs BGT's -58.06%.
XSIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSIAX and BGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer