XSFN.L vs. XLFQ.L
XSFN.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D) and XLFQ.L (Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF) are both Financials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, from Xtrackers and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSFN.L returned 9.61%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for XLFQ.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSFN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLFQ.L.
Performance
XSFN.L vs. XLFQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSFN.L achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than XLFQ.L's -4.71% return.
XSFN.L
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -2.92%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
XLFQ.L
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 6M
- -2.62%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.02%
XSFN.L vs. XLFQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSFN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D | -5.19% | 7.83% | 34.69% | 8.03% | -2.82% | 38.02% | -7.44% | 29.37% | -6.51% |
XLFQ.L Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF | -4.71% | 7.07% | 32.15% | 6.12% | -0.39% | 37.90% | -6.56% | 27.16% | -5.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSFN.L and XLFQ.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2018 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, XSFN.L and XLFQ.L have become more correlated (0.99) than their long-term average of 0.72, meaning their price movements have been converging.
XSFN.L vs. XLFQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSFN.L
XLFQ.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XSFN.L
XLFQ.L
Technology
XSFN.L
XLFQ.L
Industrials
XSFN.L
XLFQ.L
Real Estate
XSFN.L
XLFQ.L
-
Basic Materials
XSFN.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Communication Services
XSFN.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSFN.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XSFN.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Energy
XSFN.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Healthcare
XSFN.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Utilities
XSFN.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSFN.L vs. XLFQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSFN.L
XLFQ.L
XSFN.L vs. XLFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSFN.L | XLFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSFN.L | XLFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.52 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.64 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
XSFN.L vs. XLFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSFN.L drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, roughly equal to the maximum XLFQ.L drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSFN.L and XLFQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSFN.L | XLFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -35.39% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.39% | -12.81% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -19.01% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.67% | -19.01% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.19% | -6.62% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -5.65% | -0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | 5.48% | +0.24% |
Volatility
XSFN.L vs. XLFQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) have volatilities of 4.56% and 4.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSFN.L | XLFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 4.46% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 10.48% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.43% | 13.91% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 17.52% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.77% | 20.14% | +3.63% |
XSFN.L vs. XLFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSFN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XLFQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSFN.L vs. XLFQ.L - Dividend Comparison
XSFN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while XLFQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLFQ.L Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSFN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.10% | 1.69% | 2.57% | 1.31% | 1.31% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, XSFN.L and XLFQ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XSFN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSFN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLFQ.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSFN.L and 0.14% for XLFQ.L.
Find the right allocation for XSFN.L and XLFQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer