PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSFN.L vs. XSHC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XSFN.L vs. XSHC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XSFN.L vs. XSHC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSFN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D
-8.97%7.83%34.69%8.03%-2.82%38.02%-7.44%29.37%-6.51%
XSHC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D
-3.99%6.84%4.08%-3.58%8.14%28.13%9.97%16.71%12.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSFN.L achieves a -8.97% return, which is significantly lower than XSHC.L's -3.99% return.


XSFN.L

1D
1.03%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
-8.97%
6M
-5.97%
1Y
-0.71%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*

XSHC.L

1D
0.88%
1M
-5.56%
YTD
-3.99%
6M
5.20%
1Y
0.60%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XSFN.L vs. XSHC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XSFN.L and XSHC.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XSFN.L vs. XSHC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSFN.L
XSFN.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XSFN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

XSHC.L
XSHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XSHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSFN.L vs. XSHC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSFN.LXSHC.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.04

0.04

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.07

0.17

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.02

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

0.14

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.21

0.27

-0.48

XSFN.L vs. XSHC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSFN.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the XSHC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSFN.L and XSHC.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSFN.LXSHC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

0.04

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.48

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.62

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between XSFN.L and XSHC.L is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XSFN.L vs. XSHC.L - Dividend Comparison

XSFN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than XSHC.L's 1.30% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
XSFN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D
1.21%1.14%1.10%1.69%2.57%1.31%1.31%3.49%
XSHC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D
1.30%1.25%1.25%1.23%1.55%0.85%1.12%0.98%

Drawdowns

XSFN.L vs. XSHC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSFN.L drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, which is greater than XSHC.L's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSFN.L and XSHC.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XSFN.LXSHC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.95%

-19.16%

-14.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.39%

-12.94%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.67%

-19.16%

-0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.89%

-7.25%

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.11%

-4.71%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

6.15%

-1.44%

Volatility

XSFN.L vs. XSHC.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L) at 4.22%. This indicates that XSFN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSHC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XSFN.LXSHC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

4.22%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

9.66%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.07%

16.59%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

14.07%

+5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.03%

15.73%

+8.30%