XSFN.L vs. CB5.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Banks UCITS ETF (CB5.L).
XSFN.L and CB5.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSFN.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. CB5.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on Dec 4, 2008. Both XSFN.L and CB5.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XSFN.L vs. CB5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XSFN.L vs. CB5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XSFN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D | -8.97% | 7.83% | 21.71% |
CB5.L Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Banks UCITS ETF | -2.05% | 83.78% | 6.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSFN.L achieves a -8.97% return, which is significantly lower than CB5.L's -2.05% return.
XSFN.L
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- -8.97%
- 6M
- -5.97%
- 1Y
- -0.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- —
CB5.L
- 1D
- 4.61%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- -2.05%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 43.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSFN.L vs. CB5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSFN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CB5.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XSFN.L vs. CB5.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSFN.L
CB5.L
XSFN.L vs. CB5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Banks UCITS ETF (CB5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSFN.L | CB5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | 1.86 | -1.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.07 | 2.33 | -2.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.32 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 2.87 | -2.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.21 | 10.39 | -10.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSFN.L | CB5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 1.86 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.97 | -1.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between XSFN.L and CB5.L is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XSFN.L vs. CB5.L - Dividend Comparison
XSFN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while CB5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSFN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D | 1.21% | 1.14% | 1.10% | 1.69% | 2.57% | 1.31% | 1.31% | 3.49% |
CB5.L Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Banks UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XSFN.L vs. CB5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSFN.L drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, which is greater than CB5.L's maximum drawdown of -17.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSFN.L and CB5.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSFN.L | CB5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -17.55% | -16.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.39% | -15.17% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.89% | -8.48% | -2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -2.39% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 4.19% | +0.52% |
Volatility
XSFN.L vs. CB5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L) is 5.01%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Banks UCITS ETF (CB5.L) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that XSFN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CB5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XSFN.L | CB5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 9.62% | -4.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 16.42% | -5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.07% | 23.17% | -5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 21.56% | -2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.03% | 21.56% | +2.47% |