PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XLFQ.L vs. SEIV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XLFQ.LSEIV
YTD Return28.47%24.62%
1Y Return39.78%38.31%
Sharpe Ratio2.873.08
Sortino Ratio4.394.14
Omega Ratio1.561.56
Calmar Ratio4.364.71
Martin Ratio21.0319.63
Ulcer Index1.87%1.93%
Daily Std Dev13.61%12.28%
Max Drawdown-35.39%-18.18%
Current Drawdown-1.21%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between XLFQ.L and SEIV is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

XLFQ.L vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XLFQ.L achieves a 28.47% return, which is significantly higher than SEIV's 24.62% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.57%
15.19%
XLFQ.L
SEIV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLFQ.L vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLFQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
Expense ratio chart for SEIV: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for XLFQ.L: current value at 0.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.14%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XLFQ.L vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLFQ.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 3.36, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.36
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 4.79, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.79
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.64
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 6.58, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.006.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 22.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0022.62
SEIV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SEIV, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SEIV, currently valued at 3.88, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.88
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SEIV, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.53
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SEIV, currently valued at 4.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.33
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SEIV, currently valued at 18.02, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0018.02

XLFQ.L vs. SEIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLFQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the SEIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLFQ.L and SEIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.36
2.89
XLFQ.L
SEIV

Dividends

XLFQ.L vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison

XLFQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.


TTM20232022
XLFQ.L
Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
1.63%2.08%1.63%

Drawdowns

XLFQ.L vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLFQ.L drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than SEIV's maximum drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLFQ.L and SEIV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.38%
0
XLFQ.L
SEIV

Volatility

XLFQ.L vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) at 4.00%. This indicates that XLFQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.04%
4.00%
XLFQ.L
SEIV