PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSEP vs. NVII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSEP vs. NVII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSEP achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than NVII's 10.62% return.


XSEP

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.74%
6M
4.46%
YTD
5.04%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
10Y*

NVII

1D
-2.36%
1M
0.29%
6M
9.98%
YTD
10.62%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSEP vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XSEP and NVII is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025

0.55

The correlation between XSEP and NVII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSEP vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSEP
XSEP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

NVII
NVII Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSEP vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSEPNVIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.14

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.35

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.69

2.93

+10.77

XSEP vs. NVII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the NVII Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSEP and NVII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSEP vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSEP drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum NVII drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEP and NVII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSEPNVIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-18.56%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.51%

-18.56%

+15.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-12.41%

+12.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-6.26%

+5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

8.55%

-7.89%

Volatility

XSEP vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) is 0.81%, while REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a volatility of 10.47%. This indicates that XSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSEPNVIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

10.47%

-9.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.89%

27.99%

-24.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.82%

36.33%

-31.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.93%

35.54%

-28.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.93%

35.54%

-28.61%

XSEP vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than NVII's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSEP vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison

XSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.03%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XSEP and NVII have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVII has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to XSEP (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSEP dropped -9.21% vs NVII's -18.56%.

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 24.97% vs 9.00% for XSEP. On fees, XSEP is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XSEP has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 24.97% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSEP is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 57.03%, compared with 0.00% for XSEP.

XSEP is categorized as Options Trading, while NVII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XSEP and 0.99% for NVII.

XSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSEP and NVII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer