PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSEP vs. APLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSEP vs. APLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSEP achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than APLY's 14.78% return.


XSEP

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.62%
6M
4.71%
YTD
5.22%
1Y
9.42%
3Y*
9.44%
5Y*
10Y*

APLY

1D
1.28%
1M
8.89%
6M
19.82%
YTD
14.78%
1Y
38.17%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSEP vs. APLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September
5.22%8.94%8.41%9.71%
APLY
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
14.78%4.69%18.62%11.43%

Correlation

The correlation between XSEP and APLY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSEP vs. APLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSEP
XSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

APLY
APLY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
APLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
APLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLY Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSEP vs. APLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSEPAPLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.37

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.26

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.33

7.84

+6.50

XSEP vs. APLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the APLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSEP and APLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSEP vs. APLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSEP drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum APLY drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEP and APLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSEPAPLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-30.41%

+21.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.51%

-11.76%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.21%

-30.41%

+21.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-6.81%

+6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

4.88%

-4.22%

Volatility

XSEP vs. APLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) is 0.79%, while YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) has a volatility of 9.53%. This indicates that XSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSEPAPLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

9.53%

-8.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.88%

16.20%

-12.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.82%

20.00%

-15.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.94%

21.36%

-14.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.94%

21.36%

-14.42%

XSEP vs. APLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than APLY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSEP vs. APLY - Dividend Comparison

XSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.80%.


PositionTTM202520242023
APLY
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
34.80%36.38%24.95%14.36%
XSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSEP and APLY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APLY has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to XSEP (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSEP dropped -9.21% vs APLY's -30.41%.

On 3-year performance, APLY leads with 11.40% vs 9.44% for XSEP. On fees, XSEP is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XSEP has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, APLY has performed better with a 11.40% return vs 9.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSEP is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for APLY.

APLY has the higher dividend yield at 34.80%, compared with 0.00% for XSEP.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XSEP and 0.99% for APLY.

XSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSEP and APLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer