APLY vs. MRNY
APLY (YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF) and MRNY (YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, APLY returned 31.95% vs 60.66% for MRNY. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. APLY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MRNY.
Performance
APLY vs. MRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APLY achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than MRNY's 60.69% return.
APLY
- 1D
- -7.10%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- 6M
- 11.70%
- YTD
- 7.08%
- 1Y
- 31.95%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.72%
MRNY
- 1D
- -4.13%
- 1M
- -26.21%
- 6M
- 15.78%
- YTD
- 60.69%
- 1Y
- 60.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -22.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.55M | $1.69M | $1.63M | |
| $2.54M | $3.80M | $3.20M |
APLY vs. MRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 7.08% | 4.69% | 18.62% | 9.10% |
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 60.69% | -35.72% | -59.32% | 18.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLY and MRNY is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2023 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLY vs. MRNY — Risk / Return Rank
APLY
MRNY
APLY vs. MRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APLY | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.20 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 1.73 | +0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 5.11 | +0.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APLY vs. MRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLY drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, smaller than the maximum MRNY drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLY and MRNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLY | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.41% | -82.15% | +51.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -28.84% | +17.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.69% | -66.17% | +57.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -53.18% | +46.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 11.47% | -6.57% |
Volatility
APLY vs. MRNY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) is 10.36%, while YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) has a volatility of 17.82%. This indicates that APLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APLY | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.36% | 17.82% | -7.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 36.53% | -18.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.66% | 53.56% | -31.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 51.54% | -29.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 51.54% | -29.81% |
APLY vs. MRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
APLY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than MRNY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
APLY vs. MRNY - Dividend Comparison
APLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.59%, less than MRNY's 101.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 36.59% | 36.38% | 24.95% | 14.36% |
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 101.63% | 145.98% | 178.49% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APLY and MRNY have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRNY has higher volatility (17.82%) compared to APLY (10.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLY dropped -30.41% vs MRNY's -82.15%.
On 1-year performance, MRNY leads with 60.66% vs 31.95% for APLY. On fees, MRNY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, APLY has been the lower-risk option at 10.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MRNY has performed better with a 60.66% return vs 31.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MRNY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for APLY.
MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 101.63%, compared with 36.59% for APLY.
Their fees differ too: 1.04% for APLY and 0.99% for MRNY.
APLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APLY and MRNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer