XSD vs. XLU
XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) and XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSD is a Semiconductors fund tracking the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, while XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSD returned 30.69%/yr vs 9.35%/yr for XLU. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLU.
Performance
XSD vs. XLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSD achieves a 87.88% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, XSD has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 30.69%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.35% annualized return.
XSD
- 1D
- -6.88%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 87.88%
- 6M
- 83.00%
- 1Y
- 147.65%
- 3Y*
- 43.10%
- 5Y*
- 26.73%
- 10Y*
- 30.69%
XLU
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- 14.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
XSD vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 87.88% | 29.85% | 10.75% | 34.87% | -30.92% | 42.54% | 61.95% | 64.66% | -6.35% | 25.21% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 6.99% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSD and XLU is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.25 |
The correlation between XSD and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSD vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSD
XLU
Technology
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XSD
XLU
-
Energy
XSD
XLU
-
Basic Materials
XSD
-
XLU
-
Communication Services
XSD
-
XLU
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSD
-
XLU
-
Consumer Defensive
XSD
-
XLU
-
Financial Services
XSD
-
XLU
-
Healthcare
XSD
-
XLU
-
Industrials
XSD
-
XLU
-
Real Estate
XSD
-
XLU
-
Utilities
XSD
-
XLU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSD vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank
XSD
XLU
XSD vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSD | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.17 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.98 | 1.54 | +6.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.27 | 3.26 | +23.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSD vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSD drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSD and XLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSD | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -51.98% | -12.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.61% | -9.18% | -9.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.25% | -17.26% | -23.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.27% | -25.26% | -17.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.27% | -36.07% | -6.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -4.30% | -2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -10.21% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.64% | 4.32% | +1.32% |
Volatility
XSD vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a higher volatility of 22.76% compared to State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) at 5.21%. This indicates that XSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSD | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.76% | 5.21% | +17.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.53% | 11.70% | +21.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.74% | 14.69% | +26.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.20% | 17.30% | +21.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.44% | 19.29% | +16.15% |
XSD vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSD vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison
XSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than XLU's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.65% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSD and XLU have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSD has higher volatility (22.76%) compared to XLU (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSD dropped -64.56% vs XLU's -51.98%.
On 10-year performance, XSD leads with 30.69% vs 9.35% for XLU. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSD has performed better with a 30.69% return vs 9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSD.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.13% for XSD.
XSD is categorized as Semiconductors, while XLU is Utilities Equities. XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSD and 0.08% for XLU.
XSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSD and XLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer