XSD vs. URNM
XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) and URNM (NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSD is a Semiconductors fund tracking the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry, while URNM is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSD returned 29.69%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for URNM. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for URNM.
Performance
XSD vs. URNM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSD achieves a 102.14% return, which is significantly higher than URNM's 11.97% return.
XSD
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 30.91%
- YTD
- 102.14%
- 6M
- 92.84%
- 1Y
- 180.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.41%
- 5Y*
- 29.69%
- 10Y*
- 31.10%
URNM
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- -7.38%
- YTD
- 11.97%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 52.67%
- 3Y*
- 27.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.58%
- 10Y*
- —
XSD vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 102.14% | 29.85% | 10.75% | 34.87% | -30.92% | 42.54% | 61.95% | 9.69% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 11.97% | 40.78% | -14.13% | 57.80% | -11.86% | 78.32% | 68.36% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSD and URNM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019 | 0.43 |
XSD vs. URNM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSD
URNM
Technology
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XSD
URNM
-
Energy
XSD
URNM
Basic Materials
XSD
-
URNM
Communication Services
XSD
-
URNM
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSD
-
URNM
-
Consumer Defensive
XSD
-
URNM
-
Financial Services
XSD
-
URNM
-
Healthcare
XSD
-
URNM
-
Industrials
XSD
-
URNM
-
Real Estate
XSD
-
URNM
-
Utilities
XSD
-
URNM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSD vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank
XSD
URNM
XSD vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSD | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.19 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.75 | 1.65 | +8.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.91 | 3.59 | +30.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSD | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.00 | 1.03 | +3.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.32 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.67 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
XSD vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSD drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, which is greater than URNM's maximum drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSD and URNM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSD | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -50.78% | -13.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.61% | -32.04% | +13.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.25% | -50.78% | +9.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.27% | -50.78% | +8.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -26.82% | +26.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.74% | -18.03% | +4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.34% | 14.71% | -9.37% |
Volatility
XSD vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) is 14.94%, while NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 16.19%. This indicates that XSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSD | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.94% | 16.19% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.89% | 40.32% | -12.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.39% | 51.69% | -15.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.25% | 48.30% | -10.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.96% | 46.90% | -11.94% |
XSD vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSD vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison
XSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than URNM's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 2.84% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSD and URNM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URNM has higher volatility (16.19%) compared to XSD (14.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSD dropped -64.56% vs URNM's -50.78%.
On 5-year performance, XSD leads with 29.69% vs 15.58% for URNM. On fees, XSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XSD has been the lower-risk option at 14.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XSD has performed better with a 29.69% return vs 15.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.
URNM has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.12% for XSD.
XSD is categorized as Semiconductors, while URNM is Commodity Producers Equities. XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry, while URNM tracks North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSD and 0.85% for URNM.
XSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.00 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSD and URNM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer