XSD vs. SPYM
XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSD is a Semiconductors fund tracking the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSD returned 30.69%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for SPYM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
XSD vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSD achieves a 87.88% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 8.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XSD has outperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 30.69%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.61% annualized return.
XSD
- 1D
- -6.88%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 87.88%
- 6M
- 83.00%
- 1Y
- 147.65%
- 3Y*
- 43.10%
- 5Y*
- 26.73%
- 10Y*
- 30.69%
SPYM
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
XSD vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 87.88% | 29.85% | 10.75% | 34.87% | -30.92% | 42.54% | 61.95% | 64.66% | -6.35% | 25.21% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 8.21% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSD and SPYM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.68 |
The correlation between XSD and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSD vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSD
SPYM
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XSD
SPYM
Energy
XSD
SPYM
Basic Materials
XSD
-
SPYM
Communication Services
XSD
-
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
XSD
-
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
XSD
-
SPYM
Financial Services
XSD
-
SPYM
Healthcare
XSD
-
SPYM
Industrials
XSD
-
SPYM
Real Estate
XSD
-
SPYM
Utilities
XSD
-
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSD vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
XSD
SPYM
XSD vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSD | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.35 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.98 | 2.68 | +5.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.27 | 11.98 | +14.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSD vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSD drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSD and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSD | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -54.46% | -10.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.61% | -8.90% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.25% | -18.72% | -22.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.27% | -24.48% | -17.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.27% | -33.87% | -8.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -3.14% | -3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -7.14% | -6.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.64% | 1.99% | +3.65% |
Volatility
XSD vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a higher volatility of 22.76% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 4.83%. This indicates that XSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSD | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.76% | 4.83% | +17.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.53% | 9.83% | +23.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.74% | 12.46% | +28.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.20% | 16.90% | +22.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.44% | 18.03% | +17.41% |
XSD vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSD vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
XSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than SPYM's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.30% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSD and SPYM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSD has higher volatility (22.76%) compared to SPYM (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSD dropped -64.56% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, XSD leads with 30.69% vs 15.61% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSD has performed better with a 30.69% return vs 15.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSD.
SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.13% for XSD.
XSD is categorized as Semiconductors, while SPYM is S&P 500. XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSD and 0.02% for SPYM.
XSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSD and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer