PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSD vs. CNRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSD vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSD achieves a 102.14% return, which is significantly higher than CNRG's 36.68% return.


XSD

1D
1.51%
1M
30.91%
YTD
102.14%
6M
92.84%
1Y
180.25%
3Y*
46.41%
5Y*
29.69%
10Y*
31.10%

CNRG

1D
-2.81%
1M
18.72%
YTD
36.68%
6M
32.67%
1Y
117.30%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSD vs. CNRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSD
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF
102.14%29.85%10.75%34.87%-30.92%42.54%61.95%64.66%-4.55%
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
36.68%50.23%-14.48%-11.55%-7.98%-15.68%138.35%63.26%-2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between XSD and CNRG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.66

The correlation between XSD and CNRG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSD vs. CNRG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSD
CNRG

Technology

97.8%
29.1%

Energy

2.2%
3.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

41.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

25.2%

Technology

XSD
97.8%
CNRG
29.1%

Energy

XSD
2.2%
CNRG
3.0%

Basic Materials

XSD

-

CNRG

-

Communication Services

XSD

-

CNRG

-

Consumer Cyclical

XSD

-

CNRG
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

XSD

-

CNRG

-

Financial Services

XSD

-

CNRG

-

Healthcare

XSD

-

CNRG

-

Industrials

XSD

-

CNRG
41.2%

Real Estate

XSD

-

CNRG

-

Utilities

XSD

-

CNRG
25.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSD vs. CNRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSD
XSD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
XSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CNRG
CNRG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSD vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSDCNRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.46

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.75

6.65

+3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

33.91

17.06

+16.85

XSD vs. CNRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSD Sharpe Ratio is 5.00, which is higher than the CNRG Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSD and CNRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSDCNRGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.00

3.25

+1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.15

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.62

-0.18

Drawdowns

XSD vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSD drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, smaller than the maximum CNRG drawdown of -68.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSD and CNRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSDCNRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.56%

-68.49%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.61%

-17.73%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.25%

-48.77%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.27%

-59.17%

+16.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.12%

+11.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.74%

-31.82%

+18.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

6.90%

-1.56%

Volatility

XSD vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a higher volatility of 14.94% compared to SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) at 12.13%. This indicates that XSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSDCNRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.94%

12.13%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.89%

25.44%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.39%

36.49%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.25%

33.99%

+4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.96%

35.78%

-0.82%

XSD vs. CNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CNRG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSD vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison

XSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than CNRG's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
1.01%1.46%1.34%1.17%1.23%1.34%0.69%1.16%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSD
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.26%0.20%0.31%0.44%0.10%0.26%0.51%1.16%0.59%0.64%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSD and CNRG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSD has higher volatility (14.94%) compared to CNRG (12.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSD dropped -64.56% vs CNRG's -68.49%.

On 5-year performance, XSD leads with 29.69% vs 5.21% for CNRG. On fees, XSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CNRG has been the lower-risk option at 12.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XSD has performed better with a 29.69% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CNRG.

CNRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.12% for XSD.

XSD is categorized as Semiconductors, while CNRG is Alternative Energy Equities. XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry, while CNRG tracks S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSD and 0.45% for CNRG.

XSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.00 vs 3.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSD and CNRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer